page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):


Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Monday, February 27, 2012

12-02-27 Draft Human Rights Alert’s 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission // // //

Draft Human Rights Alert’s 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: The electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel and integrity of the justice system

Executive Summary                                                                                             TOC
Allegations: Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic records of the courts of the State of Israel, amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite. Such violations undermine the rule of law. Likewise, such conditions are claimed as violations of international treaties and conventions, to which the State of Israel is a party, including, but not limited to the Hague Convention (1961).
Evidence: Human Rights Alert’s (NGO) Submission is narrowly focused on analysis of the electronic record systems in national courts (Supreme Court, district courts, detainees courts [Batey Din le- Mishmoret Muhzakim]).  In particular, public access to court records and integrity of the records, which are made accessible to the public, are examined.
The analysis is based on public court records and attempts to access court records and ascertain their integrity in practice, and uses methods inspired by data-mining and zero-knowledge proofs; on consultations with Israeli law and computing experts as well as religious leaders; on media reports, and on attempts to obtain relevant public information or solicit investigation/ corrective actions by relevant national agencies.
In 2001-3, critical events took place relative to integrity of the Supreme Court’s electronic records. Numerous case files are missing altogether, a cardinal sign of judicial corruption, according to UN reports on Strengthening Judicial Integrity.  Additionally, a large number of records are falsified. Since then, the Supreme Court's electronic records have been published online unsigned and uncertified, ‘subject to editing and phrasing changes.’ The 2010 Ombudsman’s report (60b) noted various anomalies in development and implementation of the systems, including compromised security. 
Today, the Supreme Court refuses to certify its own decisions. An unsigned, undated apostille certification procedure, which is published online by the Judicial Authority, is opined as fraud, intended to simulate compliance with the Hague Convention (1961).*
In response to Freedom of Information request, the Judicial Authority claimed that there was no instructional documentation for the systems, and other requests, pertaining to the ultimate administrative authority for the servers and the authorization of the online publication of the false apostille procedure, are still pending.
Conclusions: Precipitous deterioration in integrity of the electronic records of the courts of the State of Israel is documented over the past decade in conjunction with implementation of false new online public access and/or case management systems (CMSs) in the courts.  Prevailing conditions should be deemed a failure of the legal profession, which undermines the integrity of the justice system, and with it – civil society and socioeconomic development.
Recommendations: Proposed solutions would have to draw upon civil society agents outside the legal profession, most likely – computing experts and religious leaders.  Truth and reconciliation commission may also be required, for the resolution of the disposition of the large number of court records from the past decade, which are opined as fraud or are missing, and for investigation, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice of the State of Israel have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.
The State of Israel is not alone in employing false electronic record systems in the courts to simulate the rule of law.  
* For definition of “Simulated Court Records” [Ketav Bei Din le-Mar’it Ayin], “Simulated Litigation” [Halich le-Mar’it Ayin], see Online Appendix: Table of Contents, Submission, Overview Table, Links.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -