11-12-31 Widespread corruption of the US government...// La corrupción generalizada del gobierno de EE.UU. ...// 美国政府的腐败盛行...

Secession of at least some states, would immediately put the federal government in its right place, and permit the People of the several states to regain their  sovereignty.

 

Gary, what you write I have no problem with - we are on the same page - it is widespread public corruption.

But the piece below, again gets into "Activist", "socialist", etc, etc, as if corruption has an ideological bent.  It also defeats your purpose to attribute the corruption to particular segment of the judiciary, or government in general, when the corruption is widespread and systemic.

I do not believe that there is any workable solution for the corruption of the US government, absent secession of at least some states, which would immediately put the federal government in its right place, and permit the People of the several states to regain their sovereignty.

Unfortunately, I do not believe that California is likely to be a leader in such initiative.  Montana, Vermont, New Hampshire, or Texas are likely to lead the way.

Happy 2012!
JZ

P.S.
Years ago I did some lobbying in Washington DC. It was an eye opener.  I learnt that the US was (and still is) under a one-party system - the IBP  (Inside the Beltway Party).  It really does not matter, who would win the presidential election in 2012, he/she would still be controlled by the same powers that be.  Therefore, we must boycott the election, secede.
_____  
Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/
  
Secede!____
Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)  
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal  profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______ 
  Flag Counter: 128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,239http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 585,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner

At 06:23 PM 12/31/2011, you wrote:

To All:

Many of the e-mails I send out end with the following statements:

     There is no one left to blame - but the judges/judiciary.

     Liberty & Truth require constant vigilance.

The above statements are not only true, but they are self evident.  Although the judiciary is only one of the 3 independent co-equal branches of government - each branch has its own province and particular task - separation of powers, the so-called checks & balances.  The judiciary's particular task is to act as the gatekeeper, the final backstop; to properly and honestly interpret the law and uphold the Rule of Law and our Constitution, so that our government actually has integrity and actually represents and serves the People.

Unfortunately, the judiciary, like the other 2 branches has fallen down on the job, and has come to serve someone, somethings, other than the People and has made a mess of things.  Here is an old Latin quote that sums up much of what has gone wrong: 

    Corruptisia republica plurimae leges - The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.  Cornelius Tacitus [55 -117 A.D.].

Below is a 12/29/11 wnd.com - World Net Daily article, showing in greater detail how things have gone wrong and
how - JUDGES HAVE GONE WILD!  GLZ.
____________________________________________
WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE

JUDGES GONE WILD!

How to stop activist courts from destroying America

Posted: December 29, 2011
8:45 pm Eastern

© 2011 WND

Still reeling from the Obama administration's ongoing socialist makeover of their country, most Americans have understandably focused their outrage on the executive and legislative branches of government, watching a rogue president and radicalized Congress wreak havoc on the freest, most prosperous nation on earth.

Yet, the branch of government arguably most responsible for the "fundamental transformation of America" is neither the executive nor legislative. As the January issue of WND's monthly Whistleblower magazinedramatically shows, the most arrogant, unaccountable andtransformationalbranch of government today is the judiciary, which, virtually unshackled from the Constitution, has declared itself the supreme branch of government.

Unquestionably, the most consequential downward changes America has suffered in recent decades – corruptions of law, foundational values and core institutions so radical that no president, no Congress, no governor or state legislature, could conceivably implement them – have been forced on Americans by a rogue judiciary.

Wantonly irrational and unconstitutional judicial decisions are now the norm – from the California judge who overruled the will of millions of voters and single-handedly legalized same-sex marriage in that state (only to later reveal he himself is a homosexual in a long-term relationship with another man – a gross conflict of interest); to the Ninth Circuit ruling that schoolchildren can't say "under God" when reciting the Pledge of Allegiance; to the Texas judge who threatened to throw students in jail for praying or even uttering words like "prayer" or "amen" at a graduation ceremony; to the Supreme Court's notorious 2005Kelodecision allowing local governments literally to confiscate a citizen's property and award it to another party if that "taking" increased their tax revenues; to the 1973Roe v. Wadedecision that invented the "constitutional right" to kill preborn children – 50 million and counting.

And for every high-profile case like these, there are a multitude of others – like that of the Vermont judge who took a little girl away from her loving, Christian, biological mother and awarded full custody instead to the mother's one-time lesbian partner who reportedly gives the child nightmares – decisions that, over time, have degraded Americans' basic freedoms, faith, institutions and values.

Worse, Americans have long been deceived into believing there's nothing they can do – that once a judge rules, it's "game over," especially when the Supreme Court decides a case. Only a constitutional amendment can trump a Supreme Court decision, we've been taught.

Wrong.

As "JUDGES GONE WILD"reveals, though America's judiciary has usurped power it does not constitutionally possess, it is only the cowardice and complicity of the other two branches of government – executive and legislative – and the ignorance of state governments and the general public that keep the modern myth of "judicial supremacy" alive.

In reality, as Whistleblowercomprehensively demonstrates, there are a host of powerful, constitutionally prescribed remedies a right-thinking Congress and president can readily employ to stop an out-of-control judiciary in its tracks. Whistleblower even shows how some of America's most popular presidents, from Jefferson to Jackson to Lincoln, have used these very tools to neutralize judicial tyranny and re-establish the balance of power the founding fathers ordained.

Highlights of "JUDGES GONE WILD"include:

• "Jefferson's urgent warning" by David Kupelian, who shows just how prescient the third president was in warning future generations to prevent judicial tyranny
• "Too many unlawful 'laws'" by Joseph Farah, who notes that while Americans represent only 5 percent of the world's population, they boast 70 percent of the world's attorneys
• "Anatomy of an extremist on the high court" by Aaron Klein, who documents how Justice Elena Kagan's record of radical activism severely threatens an impartial review of Obamacare
• "'Gay' Prop 8 judge 'direct beneficiary' of ruling" by Bob Unruh, exposing the ultimate conflict-of-interest case of the homosexual judge in a long-term same-sex relationship overruling 7 million California voters to legalize gay marriage in that state
• "Not judicial activism – judicialtyranny" by Patrick Buchanan, who shows how rogue judges are succeeding in imposing "a social and moral revolution on America"
• "How Mitt Romney enabled 'gay marriage'" by Amy L. Contrada, who asks: When pulled in two opposite directions, should governors – and presidents – follow the court or follow the Constitution?
• "Bringing the courts back under the Constitution" by Newt Gingrich, on exactly how the next president and Congress must reign in America's out-of-control judiciary
• "Ron Paul's 'We the People' Act would limit federal courts" by Art Moore, who points out that Congress already has the power to stop judicial activism in its tracks
• "Don't trust Supremes with Obamacare" by Bob Unruh, explaining how the 10th Amendment permits states to reject the administration's healthcare takeover, regardless of what the Supreme Court rules
  
• "Voters oust justices who established same-sex marriage" by Art Moore, on  how Iowans sent an "overwhelming message to the rest of the nation that judges can be held accountable"
• "Yes, the feds have created a tyrannical prosecutorial state" by William L. Anderson, who notes that judges and prosecutors don't want citizens to know about their power to nullify unjust laws
• "The rights of juries to judge the justice of the laws" by Lysander Spooner
• "Three cheers for jury nullification" by Vox Day, who says that since the Magna Carta, there's been one easy way to stop judicial tyranny
• "Term-limit justices, let Congress veto court rulings" by Mark R. Levin, on why the Supreme Court is just too broken to be fixed solely by "naming seemingly good candidates"
• "Reagan upheld the rule of law" by Edwin Meese III, in which the Reagan attorney general says the 40th president held that "originalism" was the only proper philosophy for a judge
• "Jefferson's solution: Statescannullify unconstitutional laws" by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

"In 1820," WND Managing Editor David Kupelian notes, "Thomas Jefferson issued a dire warning to future generations of Americans. He said, 'To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.'

"This issue of Whistleblowerexposes this 'dangerous doctrine' as the naked power grab it is," says Kupelian. "And it reveals how America can – indeedmust– reestablish the constitutional balance of powers and end the tyranny of the judiciary, which too long has served as the cutting edge in remolding America into the image of the political and moral left."

Adds WND founder and Editor Joseph Farah, "If readers truly want to find out how to stop an out-of-control judiciary that is operating way outside the bounds of the Constitution, they really need to read this particular issue of Whistleblower ."

Read more:JUDGES GONE WILD! http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=381777#ixzz1i81ZhBTT 

11-12-31 What to do when one is subjected to fraud by the US court? // ¿Qué hacer cuando uno se somete al fraude por el tribunal de EE.UU.? // 做什么，当一个人受到美国法院以欺诈？

I find no sense in subjecting myself to the abuse by any court of my own free will.   
Some corrupt US judges: Jed Rakoff, Virginia Phillips, Alex Kozinski

View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/76855163/

As a first step: I adopted the habit of adding at the end of any Request, Motion, etc, a standard statement, along the following lines:

Request for Access to the US Courts and safeguard of Federal Due Process rights

The undersigned asks that instant Request/Motion, duly filed, be duly entered, and duly adjudicated by a US Judge(s), holding all required credentials, and that a decision on instant Request/Motion, signed by such Judge(s), be duly served and noticed and authenticated by a Clerk/Deputy Clerk holding all required credentials.

If I receive an unsigned / unauthenticated judicial record on my first paper, there simply is no sense in going on, and I just walk away from the charade.

As a second step: I ask for a certified copy of any decision, order, judgment.  If the clerk of the court refuses to provide such certified judicial records, the court is certified corrupt.

I find no sense in subjecting myself to the abuse by any court of my own free will.

Additional steps: Boycott the Vote, Secede!
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
________
P.S. 
1. As demonstrated by Judge Virginia Phillips, walking away from a case and failing to oppose a Motion to Dismiss is no guarantee that the case would be dismissed either.  Corrupt judges like to prolong the abuse of the People for as long as possible and maximize the income of corrupt attorneys.
2. Media, who honestly perform their duties, should not report on any decision, judgment, decree of any US court, unless they are provided with a certified copy of the judicial record.

   Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/ 
Secede!____Human Rights Alert (NGO)  
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______   Flag Counter: 128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,239http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 585,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/____________________________ As part of efforts for the preservation of our civilization for future generations:

A call for proposals, ending January 10, 2012.

#Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds - The Party!

Late August 2012

Love, Peace, Justice 
Empowering the People through
a dance/music/art/study/pray
celebration
READ MORE:http://josephsdream2012.wordpress.com/
VIEW VIDEO:11-12-12 Oh My God, it's Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWTKQkodf7U
___________
At 05:59 PM 12/31/2011, JG wrote:

Ron;
What can we all do to help?
This must be stopped.
The federal courts around the country are dishonest and way out of control.

Cordially,

JG ___________

               On My Way To Get Justice, I Just Got Mugged!

By Ron Branson  National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief   


REQUEST FOR EN BANC DETERMINATION
Docket Number 11-56857
D.C. No.: 2:11-cv-00565-ODW-JEM
Question Presented To The Ninth Circuit For Determination En Banc:
Is Appellant Required to Present His Questions on Appeal
at the Time of Filing His Notice of Appeal?

INTRODUCTION 

This appeal arises out of a federal suit involving fraud engaged in by the underlying state court, County of Los Angeles, wherein a 11/24/2009 Minute Order was fraudulently created alleging Plaintiff was present and arraigned on criminal charges, a fact contradicted by declaration of the very court reporter noted within the 11/24/2009 Minute Order, which declaration is entered into evidence in this federal action, and unopposed by all Defendants within this case!
This fraud question passed through the hands of four federal judges who recused themselves from the case, and was passed on to a fifth federal judge who dismissed the case 10/17/2011 without dealing with the issue of fraud within the complaint or fraud within the state court system, County of Los Angeles.
Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal, and paid the $455 fee three days later on 10/20/2011, EXHIBIT A. On 10/25/2011, five days later, Appellant was sent a notice of intent to dismiss the appeal, stating “A review of the record demonstrates that this appeal may be appropriate for summary disposition because the questions on which the decision in the appeal depends may be so insubstantial as not to justify further proceedings,†EXHIBIT B. This was followed up by a second notice informing Appellate that the appeal was dismissed dated 12/8/2011, EXHIBIT C.

ARGUMENT RE QUESTION:
 Is Appellant Required to Present His Questions on Appeal
at the Time of Filing His Notice of Appeal?
 

All that had been filed in the appeal was a Notice of Appeal. Immediately thereafter, Appellant received an Order of intent to dismiss the appeal due to “insubstantial†questions presented in the appeal. The Order cites 9th Cir. Rule 3-6, but such rule cannot apply by virtue of its own wording, as the only time it can only apply, if applicable at all, is prior to the conclusion of a briefing, not before briefing begins. It is impossible to conclude what has not started. In fulfillment of the Order stating intent to dismiss, Appellant received an Order of Dismissal dated 12/8/2011 citing United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (1982), which is in apropos. The Hooton case states, “Although it is difficult to formulate a precise standard, not every case in which appellant files an unimpressive opening brief is appropriate for summary affirmance. Motions to affirm should be confined to appeals obviously controlled by precedent and cases in which insubstantiality is manifest from the face of appellant’s brief.†Twice the Hooton case states to its determination as based upon the questions presented in an opening brief. But here there is no “opening brief,†only the filing of a Notice of Appeal.
It is manifest that the intent is to dismiss this appeal at the Notice stage before the appeal started. Since the standard set forth in the Order is case precedent, the question is whether there exists case precedent within the Ninth Circuit, or any of the U.S. Circuit, to dismiss an appeal upon the filing of a Notice.
The appropriate standard to be applied here is Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 3(c)(4), to wit, “An appeal must not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice.†The filing of a Notice of Appeal is jurisdictional, and Rule 3(c)(1) states the minimum required. “The notice of appeal must: (A) specify the party or parties taking the appeal by naming each one in the caption or body of the notice… (B) designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed; and (C) name the court to which the appeal is taken.†Appellant followed the prescribed form articulately as provided within the Rules. Having so provided all the necessary information in the Notice of Appeal, “An appeal must not be dismissed†based upon reaching inadequacy. The Order of 12/8/2011 finds the “questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9^th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s order of dismissal. AFFIRMED.†The logical question is, what questions are we talking about? There are no questions presented in this appeal, either insubstantial, or otherwise, only a Notice of Appeal!

CONCLUSION
 

1.)                           The Order of Dismissal dated 12/8/2011, EXHIBIT C, runs contrary to opinion of United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982).
2.)                           The Order of 12/8/2011 runs afoul of the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 governing appeals as a matter of Right, and treats this appeal as permissive under Title 28 U.S.C., Sec. 1292(b), which statute is limited only to bankruptcy and interlocutory appeals.
3.)                           The Order of 12/8/2011 is in conflict with Title 28 U.S.C., Sec 1291, which statute, passed by Congress, governs the right of appeal, and the jurisdiction of this Ninth Circuit.
4.)                           This Order of 12/8/2011, being in violation of the Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedures, is in conflict with every other Circuit within this nation subject to Rule 3 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
5.)                           Lastly, the Order of 12/8/2011, EXHIBIT C, presents a major shift from basic due process of the First Amendment right “to petition government for a redress of grievances,†and requires a faithful en banc determination by this Circuit as to whether substantial appellate questions must attend with, or immediately thereafter, the filing of all Notices of Appeal, and failure to do so shall constitute “automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute,†Order of 10/25/2011, EXHIBIT B.

 

__________________________________             Dated:   December 30, 2011

 

11-12-31 The Latest from 11-12-31 The Latest from Countrywide's Sandor Samuels/Bet Tzedek Productions: Cynical Holocaust Exploitation Sandor Samuels/Bet Tzedek Productions: Cynical Holocaust Exploitation

Bet Tzedek's President, Sandor Samuels - former Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide, and former Associate Counsel of Bank of America - a person who was central to one of the largest frauds in the history of mankind, against homeowners, shareholders, and taxpayers, is now being koshered as Mr Jewish Justice...
     
Los Angeles, December 31 - "Sandor Samuels, President of Bet Tzedek ("The House of Justice") is the Scarlet Letter of the Los Angeles Jewish/Legal community under the current crisis," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "and recently he has been repeatedly, cynically exploiting the memory of the holocaust to kosher himself as Mr Jewish Justice."

In the latest episode, Mr Samuels is sponsoring a symposium, to be held at the University of California, Los Angeles, Faculty Center, under the title "Law, Justice, and the Holocaust".

Indisputable evidence was repeatedly produced of criminality by SANDOR SAMUELS, former Chief Legal Counsel of Countrywide and former Associate General Counsel of Bank of America:

• Massive fraud on the US tax payer, on shareholders, and on homeowners - as the key architect of Countrywide's "streamlining" of banking regulation. 
• Corruption of the courts and the legal profession - as part of the ongoing epidemic of fraud in the courts in real estate, mortgage and banking matters.

As Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide Financial Corporation and later Associate General Counsel of Bank of America Corporation, Sandor Samuels was:

• Starting at least in the early 2000s - key figure in establishing corrupt organization practices in Countrywide, with an unprecedented fraud on the US tax payer, on shareholders, and on homeowners nationwide;
• Starting in the early 2000s – key figure in corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and the US District Court, Central District of California;
• \Starting March 2007 – central figure in conduct amounting to racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court, on the grounds of Bet Tzedek, as President of Bet Tzedek; [[i]]
• In January 2008 – directly responsible for the collapse of Countrywide, following the publication of news of fraud through the filing of “Recreated Letters” as evidence in the US Bankruptcy Court in PA by Countrywide’s attorneys. [[ii]]
• In March 2008 – directly responsible for the fraud in the US District Court, TX by attorneys for Countrywide, and a Memorandum Opinion by the Hon Judge Jeff Bohm, documenting similar conduct by Countrywide in courts throughout the United States. [[iii]]
• Starting July 2008 – directly responsible for implementing similar conduct in Bank of America. [[iv]]
• 2010 – key figure in Human Rights Alert’s report, which was incorporated into the United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report, with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”. [[v]]

The Los Angeles Jewish Federation and Bet Tzedek have been repeatedly requested, since 2007, to initiate grievance procedures against Samuels and others in Bet Tzedek. [[vi]]  Both refuse to respond.

In the meanwhile, Samuels continues to serve on the boards of other Los Angeles Jewish institutions as well:

• Adat Ari-El Synagogue
• American Jewish University, Los Angeles 
• Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies
• Shalhevet School

The synergistic corruption of the US justice system and US financial institutions is at the heart of the current crisis. [[vii]]  Sandor Samuels, one of the key architects of the corruption, is now re-inventing himself as Mr Jewish Justice.

“Public corruption is properly reserved for describing corruption in full public view.  Sandor Samuels is a fine example,” concludes Dr Zernik.
Note: All releases, pertaining to Bet Tzedek and the Los Angeles Jewish Federation are copied to the Anti-Defamation League, to Bet Tzedek, and the Los Angeles Jewish Federation, as a request for comments.  No comments were returned so far.

LINKS[i] 10-06-11 Call for Accountability by the Jewish Community for Rampant Fraud at Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32918651/
10-10-05 The Los Angeles Jewish legal community again asked to assume accountability for conduct of Bet Tzedek “The House of Justice”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38696210/
10-10-11 Holly Fujie and Bet Tzedek the Los Angeles Jewish Legal Community Again Asked to Assume Accountability for Conduct of Bet Tzedek The House of Justice
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39099300/
11-03-17 No shame left in the Los Angeles Jewish Community; Countrywide’s Sandor Samuels is again President of Bet Tzedek - “The House of Justice”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50960691/
11-06-06 PRESS RELEASE: Bet Tzedek – the Los Angeles “House of Justice” - a Jewish Justice Celebration!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57205711/
[ii] 08-01-08 Case of Borrower Hills (01-22574) - in the US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh. Countrywide's Three "Recreated Letters" and a Transcript
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25003494/ 
[iii] 08-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/
[iv] 10-05-05 Countrywide, Bank of America [NYSE;BAC], and its President Brian Moynihan Compilation of Records Evidence of Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30975368/
10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Against Brian Moynihan, Bank of America [NYSE:BAC], Bryan Cave LLP, Alleging Racketeering and Large Scale Financial Institution Fraud
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[v] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination  by law enforcement in California".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[vi] See [i], above.
[vii] 11-08-08 PRESS RELEASE: Fraud and Corruption in the US Courts are Tightly Linked to Failing Banking Regulation and the Global Economic Crisis – presentation in the 16th World Criminology Congress, Japan
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62153608/
___________Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO) 
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______
  Flag Counter: 128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,239http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 585,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 millionby 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/____________________________ As part of efforts for the preservation of our civilization for future generations:

A call for proposals, ending January 10, 2012.

#Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds - The Party!

Late August 2012

Love, Peace, Justice 
Empowering the People through
a dance/music/art/study/pray
celebration
____READ MORE:http://josephsdream2012.wordpress.com/
VIEW VIDEO:11-12-12 Oh My God, it's Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWTKQkodf7U

11-12-30 Correction: Texas Governor posthumously exonerates Tim Cole, wrongly convicted

As pointed out by readers, the subject line of the message, distributed on or about December 17, 2011, was in error. 

• Governor Perry DID NOT posthumously exonerate Cameron Todd Willingham, who was put to death based on a dubious arson investigation.
• Governor Perry DID hand down the first posthumous pardon in Texas history. Timothy Cole, imprisoned while a 26-year-old student at Texas Tech University, had been failed by the justice system at every turn. But what makes his story particularly gut-wrenching is that he perished in prison even as the real rapist, Jerry Johnson, tried repeatedly to confess to the crime…

To remove any doubt, during this critical election season, in which Rick Perry, Texas Governor and also, as pointed out by a reader, former Bilderberg participant - according to Wikipedia (and caution should be used with any data derived from Wikipedia) - copied below is the entire posting, with the title line corrected.

jz
Where posted, the error was already previously corrected.
__________
Texas Governor Posthumously Exonerates Tim Cole, Wrongly Convicted

A Lubbock police photo of Tim Cole's booking in April 1985. Lubbock Police Department, Courtesy Cole FamilyDuring the past 11 years, [Rick] Perry, [Texas Governor] has presided over 238 executions, including the infamous case of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was put to death based on a dubious arson investigation. In a September debate, Perry famously said that he had lost no sleep over the possibility of an innocent man being executed on his watch.
Yet during his governorship, Texas has exonerated no fewer than 56 people. All had served years, sometimes decades, in prison; five were on death row …

Perry made those remarks during an extraordinary ceremony in which he handed down the first posthumous pardon in Texas history. Timothy Cole, imprisoned while a 26-year-old student at Texas Tech University, had been failed by the justice system at every turn. But what makes his story particularly gut-wrenching is that he perished in prison even as the real rapist, Jerry Johnson, tried repeatedly to confess to the crime…

The tale of Tim Cole and Jerry Johnson, which I investigated for more than a year, reveals a system in which an innocent man, once convicted, has virtually no chance of redemption­even with the guilty man fighting for it. For the thousands of Americans spending years of their lives in prison for crimes they did not commit, the odds couldn't be much bleaker.
…LINKS[1] 11-12-13 Schwartzapfel, B., No Country for Innocent Men _ Information Clearing House
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29965.htm
____
Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)

Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 
11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/
 
Secede!
________________

11-12-28 Obama's Birth Certificate: Flim Flam in the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit // El fraude en los tribunales de EE.UU. // 美国法院的欺诈

US judges and clerks with no credentials issue unsigned, unauthenticated judicial records, which the US courts refuse to certify, but the public is deceived to believe are valid and effectual court records. 

The United States has developed a fully blown simulated justice system.

Like the Great Depression before it, the current crisis in its core is an integrity crisis of the United States government, and like the Great Depression before it, the current crisis is not likely to be resolved, absent reform of the US courts.

  

Shell Game                                                           The Flim Flam Man       

Following is correspondence among Ron Branson, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Gary Zerman, and Joseph Zernik regarding the recent “dismissal” of Birther Orly Taitz case at the US Court of Appeals, 9^th Circuit, challenging Obama’s credentials as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, on behalf of numerous US citizens and uniformed personnel.

_______________________________________i. Joseph Zernik wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:47:53 +0200
To: Paul Andrew Mitchell
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Ninth Cir. Dismisses Suit Challenging Obama's Qualifications

I fully agree, and that is why they absolutely refuse to duly serve and notice any valid paper, and in particular, refuse to certify any record of the court.

See for example, an unrelated case:  Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al in the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.
____
[1] 11-02-09 Press Release: Dont Ask, Dont Tell  the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Simulated Appeal from a Simulated Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/

_______________________________________
ii. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote: 
At 09:45 AM 12/28/2011, you wrote:

>  There is no way that I know of to explain the refusal of a court to provide certified copies of its own orders,
>  unless the Court itself does not consider them valid court orders.

28 U.S.C. 1691 requires that ALL such Court "process" must exhibit the Court's official seal
and the Clerk's authorized signature:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1691.html
See all of the pertinent cases we assembled here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm

And, now that the "clerks" and "deputy clerks" have either failed
or refused to produce credentials, THERE ARE NO CLERKS
authorized to sign any such "process".

That also has the necessary result that such a "court" --
where no duly authorized "clerks" can be found with proper credentials --
is rendered totally impotent because it cannot issue any "process"!!!

This conclusion is supported by the law which expressly
designates the "court" as the legal custodian of the
APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by 5 U.S.C. 3331.
See 5 U.S.C. 2906:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html
When such "clerks" refuse to produce credentials of which they
are the legal custodians designated as such by 2906 supra,
they render the entire court impotent, and also implicate themselves
in FELONY violation of 18 U.S.c. 1001 (for starters):
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1001.html
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

_______________________________________
iii. Joseph Zernik wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:59:28 +0200
To: Ron Branson, Gary Zerman , Paul Andrew Mitchell,
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Ninth Cir. Dismisses Suit Challenging Obama's Qualifications

1) The  "Dismissal" by the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit"Confidence Trick", "Flim Flam", "Shell Game" -  in the terminology of tricks and frauds, it is usually considered a short-term trick. You do it on the street corner, pack and leave. And here we have a person like you fooled for years by simulated orders of the courts ... [1]  In fact, a whole nation fooled by a "simulated justice system" for a decade or two.

2) Obama's Birth CertificateOne of the aspects that I find most fascinating in this story, (and there are numerous fascinations here :) (:), is the fact that in my studies of Public Records, and I consider the deprivation of First Amendment right to access electronic records the mother/father (not to be sexist in such nasty context) of all evils, Birth, Marriage, Divorce, and Burial Records were among the first that emerged as Public Records in the late middle ages.  Public access to Court Records has been also guaranteed in the Common Law for hundreds of years.  Prisoners' Indices followed.

3) The Medieval Digital EraThe pattern we see today, of denial of public access to valid Court Records,  Birth Records, and Booking Records, and the publication instead of patently fraudulent electronic records, is one of the hallmarks of what I call the Medieval-Digital Era. 

In the Middle Ages the frauds in the courts and in lineages and family records were infamous, not to speak of anonymous, metal masked, castle-basement prisoners. It led to the provision in the Magna Carta (1215) of trial by peers...  The "cornerstone of the Constitution of the United States".

It's 2012, and we must fight for the same rights again, to ensure public access to public records!

Joseph Zernik
____
LINKS:
[1] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.

The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.

_______________________________________
iv. Ron Branson wrote:

Joseph, I just looked at my Order of Dismissal filed 12/8/2011, and not only does it not have a signature, it does not even have a printed name of a person or a position. The Oder only "signs off" with the printed word "AFFIRMED" with nothing after it. We are therefore called upon to "pretend" it is verified even though it does not state.

But is not "Affirmed" supposed to be equal to "Oath or Affirmation" according to the 4th Amendment, i.e., "no warrants shall issue but ... supported by oath or affirmation." No one can imagine an oath or affirmation signed by no one. We are asked in court, "Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?" Accordingly, maybe these words should be eliminated prior to taking the witness stand and testifying.

Ron Branson

_______________________________________
v. Joseph Zernik wrote:

Hi Mr Branson:

I assume that as usual, you received an unsigned order, just like the order dismissing the challenge to Obama's qualifications..

Have you ever tried to ask the 9th Circuit for a certified copy of any of the orders in your cases before the Court?

I have tried, but never got any.

There is no way that I know of to explain the refusal of a court to provide certified copies of its own orders, unless the Court itself does not consider them valid court orders.

In that context, one should consider the data below, which I am asking those familiar with such papers to review and comment on.

In case you decide to ask the 9th Circuit for a certified copies of any decisions in your cases, I would be grateful if you email me PDFs of the requests, and the responses, if any.

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)

_______________________________________

vi. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:

From: freedomfightersforamerica@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:freedomfightersforamerica@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Supreme Law Firm
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 12:24 AM
To: 123456xyz@gmail.comSubject: [freedomfightersforamerica] 9th Circuit of known IMPOSTORS -- Pregerson / Fisher / Berzon -- "tosses" Obama birthplace challenge
  Re:  http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/12/22/0956827.pdf Almost forgot to mention:
David O. Carter:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/nad.certificate.htm (no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/state.bar.record.2.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/affidavit.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/oath.gif
(Carter's Forms administered by Terry J. Hatter, another known impostor):
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/nad.missing.credentials.htm
(no OATH OF OFFICE and no APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/nad.certificate.htm(no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/state.bar.record.2.htmSincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

_______________________________________vii. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell 
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:12 PMSubject: 9th Circuit of known IMPOSTORS -- Pregerson / Fisher / Berzon -- "tosses" Obama birthplace challenge
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/12/22/0956827.pdf
Summary: known impostor/"robes" get routinely assigned to any case
that challenges any aspect of "public policy".

Harry Pregerson:
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/nad.certificate.htm (no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/state.bar.record.2.htm
Raymond C. Fisher:
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/affidavit.refused.JPG (defective OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/nad.certificate.htm (no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/state.bar.record.2.htm
Marsha S. Berzon:
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/affidavit.refused.JPG (defective OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/nad.certificate.htm (no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/state.bar.record.2.htm

Very interesting revelations here about Harry Pregerson and Dean D. Pregerson
by the late Gary Wean, former LAPD Detective:
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/gary.wean.article.htm (search for "Pregerson" -- all occurrences)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#CDCA
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/pregerson.dean/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/pregerson.dean/nad.missing.credentials.htm (missing all 4 credentials!)
-- Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

_______________________________________viii. Ron Branson wrote:
At 01:45 AM 12/24/2011, Ron Branson wrote:
Pastor Wiley, I just received the announcement of the dismissing of your Ninth Circuit appeals case challenging the qualifications of Barack Obama to be president. I though I would apprise you that the I just received the dismissal of my Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit. I instantly appealed the dismissal of my suit in fraud, and paid the $455 filing fee. Five days later the Court issued a noticed of intent to dismiss the Notice of Appeal. They said the issue presented on appeal was insubstantial. There was as yet any issue presented on appeal. I opposed the Order of intent to dismiss my appeal, and I received a Dec, 6, 2011 Order dismissing my Appeal, stating "The questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument." They cite to U.S. v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857. But that case is inapplicable as it refers to a case wherein the Appellant filed an opening brief, citing his argument on appeal. Here, there is no opening brief, nor are there any questions presented on appeal.
 Rule 3(c)(4) states, "An appeal must not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice." My Notice of Appeal follows precisely as shown in Form 1in the Appendix. This shows a preconceived plan by the Ninth Circuit to cut off the right of appeal at the Notice stage before any appeal issues can be presented. Attached is my opposition to dismissing my Notice of Appeal. 
 Ron Branson

_______________________________________
ix. Gary Zerman wrote:

From: Gary Zerman
To: lawsters@googlegroups.comSubject: And Another One Bites The DustDate: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:17:10 -0800
To All:

If there is one case that illustrates why we have birth certificates/records and have courts of law, it is that of Barack Obama (BO).

Yet another one bites the dust.  GLZ.____________________________________

Appeals court tosses Obama birthplace challenge

 By PAUL ELIAS | AP 4 hrs ago

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) The so-called birther movement was dealt another legal blow Thursday when a federal appeals court tossed out a lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that none of the challengers had legal standing to file the lawsuit on Jan. 20, 2009, the day Obama was inaugurated. The three-judge panel cited various reasons for disqualifying six sets of plaintiffs, who included Obama's political rivals, taxpayers and military personnel.

The birther movement has filed multiple lawsuits over the issue, so far with no success. Its leaders have lost similar challenges before the U.S. Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court.

The U.S. Constitution says only "a natural born citizen" may serve as president. The challengers allege that Obama, whose father was Kenyan, was born in that African country, rather than the U.S. state of Hawaii. They claim his Hawaii birth certificate is a forgery.

The appeals court didn't address the authenticity of the birth certificate, instead ruling that the challengers couldn't show "concrete injury" from the allegations.

The taxpayers listed in the lawsuit, for instance, failed to show how the citizenship question affected any federal taxing and spending provisions.

The lawsuit was filed in 2009 by 40 plaintiffs, including conservative activists Alan Keyes and Wiley Drake, who ran for president and vice president respectively as members of the American Independent Party against Obama in 2008.

They alleged they had standing to file a lawsuit because of their interest in competing in a fair election. Libertarian Party vice-presidential candidate Gail Lightfoot was also a plaintiff.

Judge Harry Pregerson, writing for the three-judge panel, said Keyes and Drake waited too long to file their lawsuit. The election was over and Obama was already sworn in when the lawsuit was filed.

"Once the 2008 election was over and the President sworn in, Keyes, Drake, and Lightfoot were no longer 'candidates' for the 2008 general election," Pregerson wrote. "Plaintiffs' competitive interest in running against a qualified candidate had lapsed."

Orly Taitz, one of the challengers' lawyers, said she would ask the appeals court to convene a special 11-judge panel to reconsider the case. If she's turned down there, she said she would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

Taitz said she has filed similar lawsuits in five states and has two other federal appeals pending in Washington, D.C.

http://news.yahoo.com/appeals-court-tosses-obama-birthplace-challenge-191256867.html 
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group.
To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Opposition to Order Filed Oct 25"
 2011Re Order to show cause-17-11.docm"