.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Sunday, February 27, 2011

11-02-24 Computerworld: US launches propaganda through social media // Computerworld: EE.UU. lanza propaganda a través de los medios de comunicación social // 计算机世界:美国启动通过社会舆论宣传


Comment:
Not being a lawyer, this blogger believes that this is not an ethics question, but a matter of law and rights.
JZ
____



Computerworld


Army of Fake Social Media Friends to Promote Propaganda

Does a code of ethics still exist in Intelligence firms? Does it disappear behind closed doors, dirty deeds done in the dark and used against the American people who are supposed to be free to express themselves?

It's recently been revealed that the U.S. government contracted HBGary Federal for the development of software which could create multiple fake social media profiles to manipulate and sway public opinion on controversial issues by promoting propaganda. It could also be used as surveillance to find public opinions with points of view the powers-that-be didn't like. It could then potentially have their "fake" people run smear campaigns against those "real" people. As disturbing as this is, it's not really new for U.S. intelligence or private intelligence firms to do the dirty work behind closed doors.
EFF previously warned that Big Brother wants to be your friend for social media surveillance. While theFBI Intelligence Information Report Handbook (PDF) mentioned using "covert accounts" to access protected information, other government agencies endorsed using security exploits to access protected information.
It's not a big surprise that the U.S. military also wants to use social media to its benefit. Last year, Public Intelligence published the U.S. Air Force social media guide which gave 10 tips for social media such as, "The enemy is engaged in this battlespace and you must engage there as well." Number three was "DON'T LIE. Credibility is critical, without it, no one cares what you have to say...it's also punishable by the UCMJ to give a false statement." The Air Force used the chart below to show how social media influences public opinion.
The 6th Contracting Squadron at MacDill Air Force Base sought the development of Persona Management Software which could be used for creating and managing fake profiles on social media sites to distort the truth and make it appear as if there was a generally accepted agreement on controversial issues. "Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms." What happened to don't lie and the Uniform Code of Military Justice?
Everything revealed after Anonymous leaked emails from private security firm HBGary Federal is disturbing on many levels. However, the Daily Kos said with the Persona Management Software it would take very few people to create "an army of sockpuppets" which could distort the truth while appearing to be "an entire Brooks Brothers riot online."
So again I ask, what happened to number three . . . the rule about not lying that was also "punishable by the UCMJ to give a false statement"?
President and CEO of Plessas Experts Network, Inc, Kirby Plessas pointed out some of the unethical and potentially illegal activities that Aaron Barr's leaked emails suggested like "Chumming and baiting" which sounded like "entrapment of some sort." There would be no warrant for the data collected on individuals which could then be stored for how long? "THIS is the entire reason Intelligence Oversight was created -- to avoid this sort of thing from ever happening again."
According to Redacted News, the leaked emails showed how names can be cross-referenced across social media sites to collect information on people and then used to gain access to those social ciricles. The emails also talked of how Facebook could be used to spread government messages:
Even the most restrictive and security conscious of persons can be exploited. Through the targeting and information reconnaissance phase, a person's hometown and high school will be revealed. An adversary can create a classmates.com account at the same high school and year and find out people you went to high school with that do not have Facebook accounts, then create the account and send a friend request.
Under the mutual friend decision, which is where most people can be exploited, an adversary can look at a targets friend list if it is exposed and find a targets most socially promiscuous friends, the ones that have over 300-500 friends, friend them to develop mutual friends before sending a friend request to the target. To that end friend's accounts can be compromised and used to post malicious material to a targets wall. When choosing to participate in social media an individual is only as protected as his/her weakest friend.
Lots of people have multiple online aliases, Facebook or Twitter accounts for both business and private life. What most bothers me is the lying and seemingly unethical means to an end. Although the government says it doesn't approve of censorship, etc, when its secrets come to light, it seems to be Okay with recommending underhanded tactics.
Secretary Clinton delivered a speech called, "Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices and Challenges In A Networked World." To help promote and support Internet freedom, the State Department intends to award $25 million in grants. While that is great news, the EFF reported, "For every strong statement about preserving liberty, freedom of expression, and privacy on the global Internet, there exists a countervailing example of the United States attempting to undermine those same values."
Secretary Clinton later told "This Week" anchor Christiane Amanpou that most Americans "are in favor of human rights, freedom, democracy. We know that ultimately the most progress that can be made on behalf of human beings anywhere is when those individuals are empowered, when they have governments that are responsive." Clinton added, "At the same time, we recognize that this process can be hijacked. It can be hijacked by both outside and inside elements within any country."
So while the U.S. government can talk a good talk, what it does and what it says often doesn't seem to jive. Gasp, I know, it's not a big shocker but sometimes I find that utterly frustrating. The President wanted an Internet Kill Switch, the FBI keeps pushing for backdoors on all-things-Net. What happened to a code of ethics? Does it disappear behind closed doors, dirty deeds done in the dark and used against the American people who are supposed to be free to express themselves?

11-02-28 "If law fails, CIA will assassinate Assange" // "Si la ley fracasa, la CIA se Assange asesinar" // “如果法律失败,美国中央情报局将暗杀阿桑格“

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Information Clearing House Newsletter
News You Won't Find On CNN
February 27, 2011
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"If law fails, CIA will assassinate Assange" : Video:


 Former Reagan Administration Paul Craig Roberts says there is a concerted effort to shut Assange up. If the legal attempt fails, he'll be assassinated by a CIA assassination team.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuYLHCvM-7s&feature=player_embedded
  

Saturday, February 26, 2011

11-02-26 Prof Chemerinsky asked to take a stand // El profesor Chemerinsky pidió luchar contra la corrupción judicial // 教授Chemerinsky要求法院腐败斗争

Prof Erwin Chemerinsky is asked to take a stand in view of widespread corruption of the US courts
The validity, integrity, and transparency of court records are at the foundation of Fair Hearing/Due Process and the Human, Constructional, and Civil Rights of the People. Widespread corruption of the US courts is key to the disintegration of socio-economic development and civil society in the United States under our watch.
[]
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky
Los Angeles, February 26 - following last week's letter by over 100 law professors, renowned civic leader and constitutional scholar Prof Erwin Chemerinsky has been asked by Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO) to take a public stand in view of widespread corruption of the US courts. [1] Prof Chemerinsky is the Dean of the Irvine School of Law, University of California.

In his letter, Dr Zernik noted Prof Chemerinsky's admirable courage in standing up to the corrupt Los Angeles County justice system in the aftermath of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000), and Prof Chemerinsky's lifelong commitment as a civic leader in California and beyond.

Zernik asked Prof Chemerinsky to explain to the People specific conduct of the US courts, starting from California, where Prof Chemerinsky resides.

US District Court, Central District of California
The question pertained to conduct of US Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS and Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al. Based on document examination and refusal of NAFISI to certify the records in the case, Dr Zernik opined that conduct of PHILLIPS and NAFISI in this case is Fraud, regardless of any ruling or legal opinions issued in the case:

  • The first judgment in the case was issued by US Judge GEORGE SCHIAVELLI in 2006 in favor of the USA. It was listed in the Judgment Index of the Court. However, the Clerk NAFISI refuses to certify the 2006 judgment. Consequently, the case was listed as "closed".  The 2006 judgment was never overturned through any judicial proceedings. 
  • Later, PHILLIPS appeared in the same case with no assignment order.  In 2010 she issued in the same case a second, opposing judgment in favor of Log Cabin Republicans. The 2010 judgment was NOT listed in the Judgment Index of the Court. NAFISI refuses to certify the 2010 judgment as well. 

US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
The question pertained to conduct of Circuit Judges WILLIAM CANBY, JR and EDWARD LEAVY, as well as Clerk of the Court MOLLY DWYER in the appeal from Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al. Based on document examination and refusal of DWYER to certify the docket in the appeal, Dr Zernik has opined conduct of CANBY, LEAVY, and DWYER in this case as Fraud, regardless of any ruling or legal opinions that were issued in the case.
  • The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, is today running an appeal from the 2010, uncertified PHILLIPS judgment of the US District Court.
  • Decisions of CANBY and LEAVY appear in the docket unsigned and were served with no certificate of authentication/attestation by Clerk DWYER. 
  • The US Court of Appeals refuses to explain why it would not dismiss, for lack of jurisdiction, the appeal from a void not voidable 2010 PHILLIPS judgment.
  • Clerk DWYER refuses to certify the docket of the appeal in this case.  
Supreme Court of the United State

The question pertained to conduct of Clerk of the Court WILLIAM SUTER relative to notice and service and public access to court records.  Based on review of the conduct of SUTER in multiple cases, regardless of any ruling or legal opinions in such cases, Dr Zernik opined SUTER's conduct as Fraud.
  • SUTER routinely issues notices of denial of petitions and applications in cases pertaining to civil rights, where the notices are unsigned, or signed in a false and deliberately misleading manner. 
  • The notices are never accompanied by service of any form of judicial record of the denials. 
  • Multiple attempts to access the paper court files have failed to discover any judicial record of the denials. 
  • Multiple attempt to access the electronic court records have been denied. 
  • SUTER has refused to explain, in which form, or where, the Supreme Court of the United States maintains its records. 
  • The United Nations Crime Prevention Center Report (2001) lists "missing court records" as a cardinal sign of judicial corruption.
US legal scholars can make a difference regarding widespread corruption of the courts.

Dr Zernik noted the key role that legal scholars could take in restoring the integrity of the US justice system:
  • Previous public statements by Prof ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, by Prof DAVID BURCHAM, and by Prof LAURENCE TRIBE (linked below), are admired, but they have been few and far between. Moreover, they only addressed conditions in the state courts. 
  • Last week's public statement by over 100 law professors (linked below), regarding conditions in the Supreme Court of the United States, is admirable. However, it was remarkably subtle in view of the widespread corruption of the US courts. 
Dr Zernik claims that conditions in the US courts are unprecedented, for at least a century, when the US courts were described in the US Congress as a "burlesque".

Dr Zernik also claims that fraud in the design and operation of the computer systems of the US courts is key to enabling the corruption.  Prof Chemerinsky previously claimed that as a constitutional scholar, he had no expertise in court administration. However, Dr Zernik notes "there is no doubt that the validity, integrity, and transparency of court records are at the foundation of Fair Hearing/Due Process and the Human, Constructional, and Civil Rights of the People. Widespread corruption of the US courts is key to the disintegration of socio-economic development and civil society in the United States under our watch."
____ LINKS:[1] 11-02-26 Letter to Prof Erwin Chemerinsky regarding widespread corruption of the US courtshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/49588763/Human Rights Alert - NGO
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.Locations of visitors to this page
http://twitter.com/inproperinla http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
"Innocent people remain in prison""...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
"...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
"More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (2010) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____

Friday, February 25, 2011

11-02-25 Fraud in the US Court from Coast to Coast // Fraude en los Tribunales de EE.UU. de costa a costa // 从海岸到海岸欺诈在美国法院

  
  
Henry Hudson,  Jed Rakoff,  Virginia Phillips
United States Judges


Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius - constitutional challenge to Obama's healthcare law - is part of a pattern of fraud in the US courts from coast to coast.
US judges consistently undermine the rule of law in the United States. Media and legal scholars fail to expose the fraud and inform the people.
Los Angeles, February 25
 - in Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius, Judge Henry Hudson of the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, purported to preside in litigation of a constitutional challenge to Obama's health care law.   A recent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response by the US Department of Justice has confirmed the case as another example of fraud on the court: [[i]]  
  • Judge Hudson appeared in the case with no assignment order;
  • No judgment was ever entered in the case,
  • US DOJ provided false and deliberately misleading records instead of the requested electronic certificates of authentication by the Clerk of the Court (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing).
As was previously documented: [[ii]]
  • No valid summons was found in the case docket, only summons, which was missing the seal of the court. The US law requires that the summons be issued with a signature of the clerk of the court and under the seal of the court. Absent valid summons, the litigation is invalid from its start.
  • No valid record of execution or waiver of execution of the service of summons was found in the docket.  Absent valid execution within the time prescribed by law, the case should have been dismissed by the court.
  • The Minutes, which were found in the case docket, listed no name of a Deputy Clerk, and should therefore be deemed invalid.
  • Requests, which were filed with the Clerk of the US Court, for copies of missing critical litigation records and for the NEFs remain unanswered. [[iii],[iv]] 
With it, litigation of the Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius joins the pattern, which was previously seen in litigation of cases of the highest policy significance:
  • SEC v Bank of America Corporation - by Judge Jed Rakoff in the US District Court, New York [[v],[vi],[vii],[viii]]
  • Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al - by Judge Virginia Phillips in the US District Court in California. [[ix],[x][xi],[xii]]
The pattern in these cases and others, of fraud in the US courts from coast, to coast is not partisan.  

However, based on review of numerous cases in the US courts from coast to coast, a patter does emerges:
  • US judges consistently collude with large financial institutions in undermining banking regulation and in bankrupting the United States;
  • US judges consistently collude with government and large corporations in abuse of the rights of the people;
  • US judges consistently undermine the rule of law in the United States;
  • Corruption of the offices of the clerks, from the US District Courts, through the US Courts of Appeals, to the US Supreme Court is essential part of this conduct; [[xiii]]
  • Fraud related to electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the clerks is essential to the fraud in the courts, as is the case in fraud related to foreclosure cases (robo signatures);
  • Attorneys for the US agencies (DOJ, SEC) readily participate in the charades;
  • US media report such cases, without ever informing the public that the litigation records in these cases could never be deemed valid pursuant to the US law, and
  • Legal scholars in the US fail to expose the fraud or speak up. 
LINKS:
[i] 11-02-16 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia - Constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law - US DOJ FOIA Request and Response (145-FOI-10449)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49553713/
[ii] 11-01-13 Press Release: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius in the US District Court -Constitutional Challenge to the Obama Health Care Law - Appears as Deliberately Invalid Litigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46836277/
[iii] 11-01-13 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court Eastern District of Virginia - Constitutional challenge to Obama's Healthcare law - Request for Certification of the PACER Docket
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46834168/
[iv] 11-01-13 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court Eastern District of Virginia - Constitutional challenge to Obama's Healthcare law - Request for Litigation Records from the Clerk of the Courthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/46832863/
[v] 10-12-19 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Addendum to Request for Investigation-impeachment of Judge Rakoff and Clerk Krajick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45644678/
[vi] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/
[vii] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/
[viii]  11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48244479/
[ix] 10-12-06 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California: Don't Ask Don't Tell - Evidence of Another Pretense Litigation by Judge Virginia Phillips
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44771304/
[x] 10-12-07 Press Release: Request for investigation, impeachment proceedings where appropriate, in re TERRY NAFISI - Clerk of the US Court, Central District of California-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44820392/
[xi]   11-01-08 Press Release: Don't Ask Don't Tell - Motion to Intervene, Requesting the US Court of Appeals to Dismiss the Appeals from an Uncertified Judgment
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46528428/ 
[xii] 11-02-09 Press Release: Don't Ask, Don't Tell - the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/
[xiii] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/

11-02-25 Why isn't Wall Street in Jail? // ¿Por qué no es Wall Street en la cárcel? // 为什么不是墙监狱街吗?

The Rolling Stone article below failed to dwell on one of the central features of the current financial crisis - collusion between US financial institutions and judges in both state and federal courts, as part of widespread corruption of the US justice system.
LINKS:
[1] 10-05-05 Countrywide Bank of America NYSE BAC and its President Brian Moynihan Compilation of Records Evidence of Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30975368/
[2] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
[3] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[4] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Against Brian Moynihan, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), Bryan Cave LLP, Alleging Racketeering in the courts and Large Scale Financial Institution Fraud s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[5]  11-01-10 Request No 1 for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/ 
[6]  10-12-08 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation(1:09-cv-06829)  Request No 1 for Investigation, Impeachment of RUBY KRAJICK, Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Southern District of New York
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44908376/
[7]  Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States (filed in support of Request No 1 for impeachment of US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
[8]  10-12-19 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Addendum to Request No 1 for Investigation-impeachment of Judge Rakoff and Clerk Krajick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45644678/
[9] 11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228) http://www.scribd.com/doc/48244479/ 



Rolling Stone



Financial crooks brought down the world's economy — but the feds are doing more to protect them than to prosecute them

"Criminal justice, as it pertains to the Goldmans and Morgan Stanleys of the world, is not adversarial combat, with cops and crooks duking it out in interrogation rooms and courthouses. Instead, it's a cocktail party between friends and colleagues..."
Read the full story:

Thursday, February 24, 2011

11-02-24 CCMS – California courts’ new case management system – ongoing concerns of serious Human Rights violations // Fraude en las cortes de California // 在加州法院欺诈




CCMS must be subjected to publicly and legally accountable validation. 

Los Angeles, February 24 – Following Corporate Counsel’s recent report, “Critics Cry 'Reboot' at Troubled Court Case Management”, [1] regarding the new California courts’ case management system, CCMS, Human Rights Alert has sent corrections and comments to the editor:

1)      Please stand corrected regarding the opening statement: "...clunky legacies of the days when counties, not the state, funded courthouses."
  • In the late 2000s, the 70 year old former US prosecutor Richard Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the fact that all Los Angeles County Superior Court judges continued to secretly accept payment (~$45,000 per judge per year) for over a decade, failed to list the payments in their annual outcome income disclosures, and failed to disclose the payments to parties in cases involving the payer - Los Angeles County.  In parallel, Richard Fine documented that it became practically impossible to win a case in court against Los Angeles County.  Media described the payments as "bribes".
  • In 2008 such payments were ruled as "not permitted".
  • On February 20, 2009, the California governor hastily signed "retroactive immunities" ("pardons") for all judges, who received such payments at the behest of the California Judicial Council. Albeit, the California Constitution prohibits retroactive laws.
  • On March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Warrant Detail, albeit, with no warrant at all.  He was consequently held for 18 months in solitary confinement, while no judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case. [2]
  • In summer 2010, Human Rights Alert's submission regarding conditions in the Los Angeles County courts, including, but not limited to, large scale false imprisonments, [3] housing/financial institution fraud in the courts, and fraud opined in Sustain, the Court's current case management system, [4] led to official United Nations report, referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California". [5]
2)      The new case management system of the California courts (CCMS) is a cause for serious Human Rights concerns.
In June 2010 Human Rights Alert issued the following statement: The April 12, 2010 Status Report by the California Judicial Council in re: CCMS development and implementation,  must be a reason for grave concerns of Human Rights abuses, and must be subjected to publicly and legally accountable validation. [6]
_____
LINKS:
[1] 11-02-28 Critics Cry 'Reboot' at Troubled Court Case Management (CCMS) - Corporate Counsel
[2] 09-12-17 Richard Isaac Fine - Review
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/
[3] 09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/[4] 11-02-06 Sustain Technologies - Corruption of the State Courts Has Deep Roots in Los Angeles County, California
[5] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[6] 10-06-14 New Case Management System (CCMS) of the California Courts - Serious Human
Rights Concern
______
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
Locations of visitors to this page
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_______________________WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*     "Innocent people remain in prison"*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine