Los Angeles, December 8 - in view of the recent accusatory exchange between the United States and Russia, regarding integrity of the Russian election process, one should be reminded that the 2012 US presidential elections are likely to be the first conducted:
- Under fraud by the US Supreme Court, which published online that "Judgment" in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission was "issued", but no "Judgment" record was ever discovered, ever served, or ever entered, and
- With a Democrat incumbent, who published a digital fraud instead of an authentic long-form birth certificate.
- 2000 Election, where the outcome was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in Bush v Gore;
- 2004 Election, where Diebold electronic voting machine fraud has been repeatedly alleged;
- 2008 Election, where Obama was a candidate of dubious eligibility.
The FEC has never been served with a valid, signed, authenticated record of the US Supreme Court Judgment, and such record has never been discovered yet. The records of US District Court in Washington DC, in which the case originated, start with an invalid Summons, end with a Judgment that was not recorded in the Judgment Index of the Court, with an ‘off the record’ proceeding in between.
Cynthia L. Bauerly
- Why would the FEC not disregard the cases of Citizens United v FEC in the US District Court, DC, (1-07-cv-2240) and in the US Supreme Court, (08-805), as matters that have never been litigated and decided pursuant to the law of the United States? [[i]]
However, based on review of US Supreme Court, US District Court, Washington DC, and FEC and US Solicitor General FOIA-response records, the request opined that Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-805) in the US Supreme Court and Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (1-07-cv-2240) in the US District Court, DC, were cases of Simulated Litigation. [[iii]]· No valid summons was ever issued or served on the FEC in the case in the US District Court, DC
· No Judgment is listed as entered in the Judgment Index of the case in the US District Court, DC
· No valid, duly signed and authenticated record of the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has been discovered so far.
· There is no record to show that the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has ever been served by the Clerk of the US Supreme Court on the FEC.
The requester, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has gained substantial experience in examination of computerized records in large corporate and government systems. His opinions in such matters have been supported by highly reputed fraud and computer science experts. Papers he has authored on the subject were peer-reviewed and published in a computer-science journal and presented in international computer-science and criminology conferences. [[iv]]
Report, authored by him, and based in part on analysis of computerized court records, was incorporated into the official 2010 Staff Report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, as part of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States, with a reference note stating:
Corruption of the courts and the legal profession... [[v]]
The request was copied to Senator Dianne Feinstein.
LINKS[i] 11-05-24 RE Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) - Request for Policy Statement by FEC s
[ii] 0-01-21 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010) at the Supreme Court of the United States - opinion of Prof Chemerinsky and Wikipedia overview
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code; §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[iv] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
[v] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
________2) The ongoing Sheriff Joe/Birth Certificate saga - and legitimacy of the 2012 US presidential election
The Birthers, like the Occupy movement, will not be brushed off through a media blackout and obfuscation in the US Courts... And if media focus on the issue of the Birth Certificate and the multiple Social Security numbers early, rather than later in the campaign, the US may be saved yet another historic constitutional disgrace...
a) , or b)
Birth Certificates from Hawaii, 1961:
a) Obama's digitally-generated birth certificate, released by the White House, and
b) Authentic microfilm copies of contemporary birth certificates.
Regardless of one's opinion of the maverick Sheriff Joe, one must notice with concern his observations (below) regarding the dubious nature of the Obama's long form Birth Certificate, and conduct of the media in this regard.
Obama's dubious Birth Certificate and multiple Social Security numbers, if not adequately addressed in a timely manner, are likely to undermine even the appearance of legitimacy of the 2012 presidential election in the United States.
Therefore, the 2012 election could become the next logical step:
- 2000 election, where the outcome was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in Bush v Gore; [i]
- 2004 election, where Diebold electronic voting machine fraud has been repeatedly alleged; [ii]
- 2008 election, where Obama was a candidate of dubious eligibility;
- 2012 election, where the eligibility of the incumbent president, running for reelection, will have been opined by law enforcement deficient, or even fraud.
LINKS:[i] Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)
[ii] The 2004 US Elections: The Mother of all Vote Frauds
10-08-28 Common Cause Voting Machines Report Malfunction and Malfeasance
Posted: November 09, 2011
8:29 pm Eastern
… WND has previously reported Arpaio has demanded to see the original microfilm records of Obama's birth certificate held in the vault of the Hawaii Department of Health.
WND has also reported that on April 27, the White House released three versions of Obama's long-form birth certificate, each one of which appears fundamentally different from the other two:
1. An electronic PDF computer file that contained a green background clearly showing the green hash marks of Hawaii Department of Health security paper;
2. A photo taken by the Associated Press and attributed to J. Scott Appleworth shows a blue background, with no hash marks and no green security paper background; and
3. Two photographs the White House staff allowed NBC photographer Savannah Guthrie take on April 27 that show a gray background on which grey hash marks are clearly visible on the security paper background.
Arpaio has also suggested the White House should authorize the Hawaii Department of Health to release for independent court-authorized forensic examination any 1961 paper-and-ink original Obama birth records the department has on file.
Read more:Sheriff Joe threatened for probing eligibility
Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
Flag Counter: 128http://inproperinla.blogspot.
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 millionby 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
Love, Peace, Justice
Empowering the People through
date to be scheduled
email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org
READ MORE: http://josephsdream2012.
WATCH THE YOUTUBE VIDEOS: From Jerusalem to the Wall Street Protesters: we must bring this Robber Baron Era to an end!
 "Come to Jerusalem," says Mr Take It Easy...
 The Brits Say: Come One Come All, Party in Jerusalem!