page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):


Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

11-05-24 FEC is asked to disregard Citizens United v Federal Election Commission // Fraude en los EE.UU. Corte Suprema de Justicia // 欺诈在美国最高法院

The FEC has never been served with a valid, signed, authenticated record of the US Supreme Court Judgment, and such record has never been discovered yet.  The records of US District Court in Washington DC, in which the case originated, start with an invalid Summons, end with a Judgment that was not recorded in the Judgment Index of the Court, with an 'off the record' proceeding in between.
Chair Cynthia L. Bauerly Federal Election Commission, United States of America (logo). Link to FEC Home Page

Cynthia L. Bauerly
FEC Chair

Los Angeles, May 24 - in a letter to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chair Cynthia Bauerly, the Commissioners, the Acting General Counsel, Acting Staff Director, and the Inspector General, the FEC was asked:
Why would the FEC not disregard the cases of Citizens United v FEC in the US District Court, DC, (1-07-cv-2240) and in the US Supreme Court, (08-805), as matters that have never been litigated and decided pursuant to the law of the United States? [[i]]
Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) (08-205) was reported as one of the landmark decisions of the US Supreme Court.

"[D]ecision holding that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money in election campaigns... a stunning example of judicial activism." [[ii]] 

However, based on review of US Supreme Court, US District Court, Washington DC, and FEC and US Solicitor General FOIA-response records, the request opined that Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-805) in the US Supreme Court and Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (1-07-cv-2240) in the US District Court, DC, were cases of Simulated Litigation. [[iii]]
  • No valid summons was ever issued or served on the FEC in the case in the US District Court, DC
  • No Judgment is listed as entered in the Judgment Index of the case in the US District Court, DC
  • No valid, duly signed and authenticated record of the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has been discovered so far.
  • There is no record to show that the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has ever been served by the Clerk of the US Supreme Court on the FEC.
The requester, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has gained substantial experience in examination of computerized records in large corporate and government systems.  His opinions in such matters have been supported by highly reputed fraud and computer science experts.  Papers he has authored on the subject were peer-reviewed and published in a computer-science journal and presented in international computer-science and criminology conferences. [[iv]]

Report, authored by him, and based in part on analysis of computerized court records, was incorporated into the official 2010 Staff Report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, as part of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States, with a reference note stating:  
Corruption of the courts and the legal profession... [[v]]
The request was copied to Senator Dianne Feinstein.
[i] 11-05-24 RE Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) - Request for Policy Statement by FEC s
[ii] 0-01-21 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010) at the Supreme Court of the United States - opinion of Prof Chemerinsky and Wikipedia overview
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code; section 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[iv] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
[v] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)Human Rights Alert - NGO  Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States._______  http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/  Locations of visitors to this page Flag Counter: 119http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 431,060Followers: 626http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp ://twitter.com/inproperinla
Total Item Views: 342,338

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -