.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

11-04-27 Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler is provided with additional evidence of large-scale computer fraud in the US courts // Fraude en los tribunales de los EE.UU. // 在美国法院欺诈

The US courts computer systems - PACER and CM/ECF - enable the routine churning out of fraudulent records in the US  courts.  The systems undermine both Human Rights and Banking Regulation in the United States. Prof Yochai Benkler, an expert on computers and the law, has been asked to review the evidence and provide an opinion.
[]  [] []

Los Angeles, April 27 - "Large-scale computer fraud undermines the foundation of the US courts and US justice system," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "the evidence is pervasive of routine issuance of adulterated court records."

Professor Yochai Benkler, of Harvard Law School, an expert on computers and the law, has been previously provided with evidence of the fraud in PACER and CM/ECF - the record keeping systems of the US Courts. [[i],[ii]]  That evidence was primarily produced by Dr Zernik.  Dr Zernik's findings were also published in an international computer science journal, with Editorial Board listing scholars from six European nations and Canada, including Director of the IBM Research Center in Ireland. [[iii]]  Leading law and technology journals in the United States refused to review papers on the subject.
Now, Dr Zernik has provided Prof Benkler with additional evidence of the fraud in PACER and CM/ECF from an independent source - a publication in the National Law Journal by ProPublica reporter Dafna Linzer, documenting adulteration of court records in the habeas corpus case of GITMO detainee Uthman Abdul Rahim Mohammed Uthman in the US District Court in Washington DC.  [[iv]]

The US courts have installed an online public access system (PACER) and case management system (CM/ECF) in the early 2000s.  " PACER and CM/ECF enable the courts to routinely publish online records that are fraud," says Dr Zernik.

The best example, showing the systems enabling the abuse Human Rights, according to Dr Zernik, remains the case of the arrest and habeas corpus petitions of the 70 year-old former US prosecutor Richard Fine.  Richard Fine exposed and rebuked the taking by Los Angeles judges of "not permitted" payments ("bribes").  Later, Richard Fine was held for 18 months in solitary confinement by the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department.  However, the online Inmate Information Center listed him as imprisoned on location and by authority of the non-existent "Municipal Court of San Pedro". 

Fine's habeas corpus petition in the US District Court in Los Angeles and the US Court of Appeals, 9thCircuit, appeared as true litigation in the online PACER records, but were replete with unsigned, uncertified - invalid court records. [[v]]

According to Dr Zernik, the fraud in US courts records is not limited to civil rights cases, but also undermine banking regulation.  Dr Zernik produced detailed review of the fraud in conduct of litigation in cases of the highest public policy significance, which were repeatedly reported in both US and international media, including, but not limited to the litigation of SEC v Bank of America Corporationin the US Court in New York by Judge Jed Rakoff. [[vi]]  "Fraud in the US courts undermines any prospect of honest banking regulation in the United States during the current financial crisis," Dr Zernik says.

While internationally, Dr Zernik's opinions regarding fraud in computer systems of both the state and US courts are re-affirmed, US experts have so far been reluctant to opine on the matter. [[vii], [viii],[ix],[x]] 

Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California, and Law Dean Martha Minow of Harvard University have previously refused to provide an opinion. The former claimed that he had no expertise in computers and court administration, and the latter claimed that she was prevented from opining on the matter due to her position as Harvard Law Dean.  Most recently, Dr Zernik has asked Prof Yochai Benkler of Harvard Law School, an expert on computers and the law, to opine on the matter.

Prof Benkler was one of the authors of the recent letter regarding the humiliation of Private Bradley Manning. "Prof Benkler has shown courage in highlighting the abuse of the Human Rights of Private Manning.  I hope that he would also be willing to review the evidence of abuse of Human Rights of all in the United States," says Dr Zernik.

LINKS:
[i] 11-04-14 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler has been asked to review the evidence of large-scale computer fraud in the US courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52993968/
[ii] 11-02-09 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell": the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/
[iii] Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[iv] 0-10-11 in GITMO Opinion, Two Versions of Reality - The National Law Journal
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53954229/
[v] 10-04-20 Fine v Baca (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court: Motion to Intervene and related papers: Motion to Intervene and related papers
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/ 
[vi] Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
[vii] 09-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir's Opinion Letter re: Sustain - the Case Management System of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46069337/
09-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, directory information
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30454039/
[viii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[ix]  Zernik, J: Fraud and Corruption in US Courts are Tightly Linked to Banking Fraud and the Global Economic Crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress, 2011[x] Zernik, J: Corruption of the Courts and the Legal Profession in California Noted in a 2010 United Nations Report, 16th World Criminology Congress, 2011 

3 comments:

  1. Excellent report.
    Posted 3 hours ago By Arizona_Patriot (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Richard Fine defied the court and refused to produce financial records as ordered. He was a vexatious litigator who had been harassing judges with repeated lawsuits on issues that he had already lost rulings on, costing them a fortune in litigation costs.

    There is absolutely no mystery as to why he was locked up or who locked him up. All along he held the keys to his own cell and could have freed himself by submitting financial records to establish his ability to compensate his victims as ordered.

    Once facing the consequences of his illegal defiance of court orders some people wanted special treatment for their friend. His incarceration is some indication that a well connected influential lawyer is not above the law, even when there is a well orchestrated campaign to obscure the fact that he was in ongoing defiance of the law they pretended he championed. Less..
    Posted 33 mins ago By Dorbie (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Dorbie:
    If things were so clear,why was it necessary to hold Richard Fine for 18 months in solitary confinement under fraudulent arrest and booking records, stating that he was arrested and imprisoned on location and by authority of the non-existent "Municipal Court of San Pedro"?

    For further review of the fraud in records of the US District Court in Los Angeles, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, see review of the habeas corpus of Richard Fine, linked below. [1]

    You also failed to address the main point of this latest press release - the report by the National Law Journal of fraud in the records of the US District Court in Washington DC in the habeas corpus petition of a GITMO detainee...

    Needless to say, you failed to address the evidence of fraud in the court records of the US District Court in NYC in SEC v Bank of America Corporation...

    And the you are also more than welcome to explain the fraud in the records of Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al in the US District Court in Los Angeles and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. [2]

    The examples go on and on and on...

    Joseph Zernik, PhD
    Human Rights Alert (NGO)

    LINKS:
    [1] 11-04-23 Habeas Corpus in the United States - the case of Richard Isaac Fine
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/
    [2] 11-02-09 Press Release: ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ – the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/
    Posted less than a minute ago By jz12345

    ReplyDelete

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine