.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Friday, March 25, 2011

11-03-25 The riddle of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission... // Faltan los registros de la Corte Suprema de los EE.UU. // 美国最高法院丢失记录

   

The riddle of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission... The missing February 22, 2010 Judgment...
Citizens United v Federal Election Commission presumably accorded corporations First Amendment rights.  However, the First Amendment right of the people, for access to valid and effectual records of the Supreme Court of the United States, is denied.


Los Angeles, March 25 - Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-205) is no doubt one of the landmark decisions of the US Supreme Court. It was reported to have accorded corporations First Amendment rights.   However, a valid and effectual copy of the February 22, 2010 Judgment in the case - a historic document - is yet to be discovered...

Review of online records of the US Supreme Court [1] shows:

  • The journal for January 21, 2010, the date of the presumed decision, is missing the typical introductory remark, found in many (but not all) seatings of the court, regarding certification and entry of the orders and decisions.  
  • For example, on January 25, 2010, the immediate next seating of the Court, the introductory remark says:
"The Chief Justice said:
We have issued orders today, they have been duly entered and certified, and filed with the Clerk." [underline added -jz]
  • The online docket of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission says:
"Feb 22 2010 JUDGMENT ISSUED."  [underline added -jz] 
"Issuing" of orders and judgments, which are neither certified, nor entered, is a common fraud in the lower courts... [2]



Additional efforts to discover the February 22, 2010 Judgment were unsuccessful:
  • Request was forwarded to parties in the case, for a copy of the judgment, which was supposed to have been noticed and served.  One party responded that the February 22, 2010 Judgment was neither served nor noticed, in apparent violation of Due Process rights.  No party responded that a February 22, 2010 Judgment was either noticed or served. 
  • The US Department of Justice, in response to a Freedom of Information request for the February 22, 2010 Judgment, responded that "The Civil Division does not maintain records relating to that case."   
  • Previous attempts to discover valid and effectual judicial records in paper court files of the US Supreme Court uniformly failed. Access to the electronic records of the US Supreme Court was and is denied, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights. [3]
Reports of the United Nations Crime Prevention Center on "Strengthening Judicial Integrity" list missing court records as a cardinal sign of judicial corruption. [4,5]

    With it, the vague and ambiguous records of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-205) join the likewise vague and ambiguous records of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394, where the Supreme Court was reported to have recognized corporations as persons for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment.

    In shortCitizens United v Federal Election Commission presumably accorded corporations First Amendment rights.  However, the First Amendment right of the people, for access to valid and effectual records of the Supreme Court of the United States, is denied.  As a result, at present, there is no way to ascertain, whether in fact a valid and effectual February 22, 2010 Judgment in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission was ever certified and entered.
      
    LINKS:
    [1] 11-03-16 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-205) in the Supreme Court of the United States - Review and Compiled Online Records
    [2] 11-02-09 Press Release: 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'  the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, Insists on Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court
    [3] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER s
    [4] 00-04-00 Report of the First Vienna Convention - Strengthening Judicial Integrity, CICP-6, United Nations Drug Control and Crime Prevention Center (2000) (See p5-6)
    [5] 01-03-01 Strengthening Judicial Integrity Against Corruption CICP-10, United Nations Drug Control and Crime Prevention Center (2001) (see p5-6)

    2 comments:

    1. The Bill of Rights has now stood for some 219 years, and has made Americans the envy of the world, in which the protected rights expressed in the Bill of Rights are only dreamed about by most of the world's people.

      However, perhaps never before have the freedoms protected by the Bill of Rights been as threatened as they are today by an ever-expanding Congress, ever-expanding Executive Branch, and, perhaps the most pernicious of all, an ever-expanding Judicial Branch, in which only one class of citizens may serve, lawyers.

      Those unelected, unaccountable, life-tenured lawyers sitting as federal judges, ruling in robes like feudal Lords or Old Testament High Priests, and sitting high above citizens on raised "benches" in marbled and palatial federal courts intended to awe and intimidate mere mortals, have made themselves the supreme power of the nation.
      Read more at http://www.oathkeepers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=10939
      Posted 1 hour ago by "BarrySoetoro" (R)(USA)

      ReplyDelete
    2. Wow, Marx's solutions are shite, but his critique of and predictions for the corporate capitolist state are truer by the day. For all you commie frothing tea baggers note most of those judges were appointed by Republicans. That's how they roll, they create or exagerate threats like commies or terrorists and use that cloak to steal your divine constitutional rights.
      Posted 9 hours ago by "rozza2012" (R) (Japan)

      ReplyDelete

    Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

    RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

    Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

    Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine