.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

11-03-09 US Supreme Court - Denial of access to judicial records // Corte Suprema de EE.UU. - Denegación de acceso a los expedientes judiciales // 美国最高法院- 获得司法记录拒绝

 
Latest Judgepedia contribution:

Supreme Court of the United States


Denial of due process notice and service and public access to judicial records, to inspect and to copy

The right for Due Process notice and service of judicial decisions is well established in US law as a fundamental Civil Right. Likewise, the right for notice and service of judicial decisions is part of the Human Right for Fair Hearing.
The common law right of public access to judicial records, to inspect and to copy, was re-affirmed by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978), as inherent to the First, Sixth, and Fifth/Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
In recent years, computerized case management and public access systems have been implemented in the Supreme Court. There is no doubt that such systems could have enhanced the validity, integrity, and transparency of judicial records. However, in parallel to the implementation of such systems, it has been documented that individuals received only notice of judicial decisions in petitions and application, but no service of any judicial records of the decisions themselves. In addition, repeated attempts failed to discover the corresponding judicial records in the paper court files of the Supreme Court failed, to the degree that access to the paper court files was permitted. Requests to access the corresponding electronic judicial records of the Supreme Court were uniformly denied. [11]
Therefore, in parallel to the implementation of computerized case management and public access system in the Supreme Court, conditions have been created, where no access is permitted to judicial records to both parties and the public at large.
Reports of the United Nations Drug Control and Crime Prevention Center, pertaining to strengthening of judicial integrity against corruption:
  • Call for the implementation of electronic system to enhance public access to judicial records, [12]and
  • List missing judicial records as an indicator of judicial corruption. [13]
The lack of transparency and the absence of comprehensive and regularly updated databases further worsen the effects of corruption in the judiciary. Such situations easily lend themselves to inconsistencies in the application of the law and make it much more difficult to identify patterns, trends or individual cases in which incorrect or anomalous results suggest the possibility of corruption.
...
Indicators of corruption, as perceived by the public, include: ... lack of public access to records of court proceedings; disappearance of files...

References



No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine