.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Saturday, February 12, 2011

11-02-13 Additional Evidence of Racketeering in the US Courts // Evidencia adicional de crimen organizado en los EE.UU. Tribunales // 敲诈勒索的其他证据在美国法院


William Windsor

Maid Of The Mist Corporation et al v William Windsor(1:06-cv-00714) - likely to be part of racketeering in the US District Court, Northern District of Georgia
The pattern is again of a cascade, similar to that which was found in other US courts: 


  • Racketeering in the US District Court, Northern District of Georgia
  • Pretense Appeal in the US Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit
  • Fraud in papers of the Supreme Court of the United States
Case Records:[1] Maid Of The Mist Corporation et al v William Windsor (1:06-cv-00714) http://www.scribd.com/doc/45084688/_______

General Notes:
1.      Case Summary and Docket as a whole:

a.       No name and authority is listed as to the individuals who entered notations and records in the Docket.
b.       All Attestation records (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing) by the Clerk of the US District Court were excluded from the Docket.
2.      Public Access to the Judgment Index of the Court is denied. The US District Court, Northern District of Georgia differs in this matter from most US District Courts, which were examined.  [[i]] It is likely that upon investigation, it would be discovered that the Northern District of Georgia routinely engages in racketeering relative to false pretense of entry of judgments in litigations in the Court.

3.      Pending Statuses Report shows: "No statuses pending, No statuses terminated."

4.      Related Transactions Report shows the Complaint not terminated, even after the case is listed in an unnumbered docket entry as "terminated".

Specific Docket Records:
1.      No Assignment Order for Judge J Owen Forrester appears in the Docket.

2.      March 29, 2006 Dkt #008 Recusal and Reassignment:

a.       No Reassignment Order for Judge Orinda D Evans appears in the docket.

b.       The docketing text states reassignment, but the record itself includes nothing to that effect.

5.      The Writ of Execution was never docketed, and no Dkt # was designated. Therefore, no NEF could possibly be issued on such docket notation:

a.       After #753 04/09/2010 WRIT of Execution issued in the amount of $192,377.87 against William M. Windsor. Original mailed to Carl Anderson via certified mail. (ank) (Entered: 04/09/2010)

6.      All certificates by the Deputy Clerks, consistently, were not docketed, and no Dkt #s were designated to them. Therefore, no NEFs could possibly be issued on the certificates. In other words - none of the records, notated as certified, is in fact certified:
a.       After Dkt #157 02/02/2007 ORAL ORDER DENYING 59 Defendants' Motion to Compel and for Attorney Fees. Entered by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 2/2/07. See 157 Minute Sheet from In Chambers Conference. (ddm) (Entered: 02/05/2007)
b.       After Dkt #369  05/13/2009 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 369 Order. (ank) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
c.        After Dkt #390  05/22/2009 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 390 Order. (ank) (Entered: 05/22/2009) [re: Recusal �jz]
d.       After Dkt #731 01/13/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 731 Order (ank) (Entered: 01/13/2010)
e.       After Dkt #742 03/10/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 742 Order (ank) (Entered: 03/10/2010)
f.         After #744 03/11/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing re 744 Order as to William M. Windsor, Marc W. Brown, Michelle Thornton, and Ryan Windsor as directed within the Order. (ank) (Entered: 03/11/2010)
g.       After #753 04/09/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 752 Order and 753 Clerk's Judgment (ank) (Entered: 04/09/2010)
h.       After #756 04/12/2010 Certified Mail Returned Receipt re Writ of Execution Issued. Delivered to Carl Anderson. (ank) (Entered: 04/13/2010)
i.         After #777 04/21/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 777 Order (ank) (Entered: 04/21/2010)
j.         After #794 04/26/2010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re 794 Contempt Order,,,,,, (vh) (Entered: 04/26/2010)
k.        After #706 04/29/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 809 Order (ank) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
l.         After #815 04/30/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 815 Order. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER HAND DELIVERED TO FINANCIAL DEPT. (ank) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
m.     After #828 05/03/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 817 Clerk's Judgment and 816 Order. (ank) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
n.       After #823 05/04/2010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re 823 Order. (dfb) (Entered: 05/04/2010)
o.       After #833 05/04/2010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re 833 Order. (dfb) (Entered: 05/04/2010)
p.       After #840 05/05/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 840 Order (ank) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
q.       After #864 05/14/2010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re 864 Order. (dfb) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
r.         After #870 05/17/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 870 Order (ank) (Entered: 05/17/2010)
s.       After #887 05/25/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re the 885 , 886 and 887 Orders (ank) (Entered: 05/25/2010)
t.         After #902 05/28/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 909 Order (ank) (Entered: 05/28/2010)
u.       After #912 05/28/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 912 Order (ank) (Entered: 05/28/2010)
v.        After #921 06/18/2010 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 921 Order (ank) (Entered: 06/18/2010)
w.      After #951 11/22/2010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc W. Brown re 951 Order. Copy of Order forwarded to Clerk's Office Financial Dept. (ank) (Entered: 11/22/2010)
x.        After #976 12/30/2010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor and Marc Brown re 976 Order, 974 Order and 975 Order (ank) (Entered: 12/30/2010)
y.       After #977 01/05/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re 977 Exhibit Return Notification. (pdw) (Entered: 01/05/2011)
7.      All Certificates, which were filed by Defendant Windsor, were likewise not docketed, and no Dkt #s were designated to them. Therefore, no NEFs could possibly be issued on the certificates. In other words - none of the records, notated as certified, is in fact certified:
a.       After #45: 06/19/2006 CERTIFICATE OF READINESS of Appeal Record re 41 Notice of Appeal filed by Alcatraz Media, LLC,, Alcatraz Media, Inc.,, William M. Windsor,. USCA Case Number 06-13272-GG (fem) (Entered: 06/19/2006)
b.       After #281: 10/19/2007 CERTIFICATE OF READINESS of Appeal Record re 254 Notice of Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor, Alcatraz Media, Inc., Alcatraz Media, LLC, 256 Notice of Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor. USCA Case Number 07-14214-I (fem) (Entered: 10/19/2007)
c.        After #335 01/14/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF READINESS of Appeal Record re 291 Notice of  Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor, 328 Notice of Appeal, filed by Alcatraz Media, Inc., Alcatraz Media, LLC, 254 Notice of Appeal,, filed by William M. Windsor, Alcatraz Media, Inc., Alcatraz Media, LLC, 292 Notice of Appeal filed by Alcatraz Media, Inc., Alcatraz Media, LLC, 329 Notice of Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor, 256 Notice of Appeal, filed  by William M. Windsor, 293 Notice of Appeal,, filed by Alcatraz Media, Inc., Alcatraz Media, LLC, 290 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor. USCA Case Number 07-14214-I; 07-14235-I; 07-15200-BB; 07-15865-BB. (fem) (Entered: 01/14/2008)
d.       After #528 08/25/2009 CERTIFICATE OF READINESS of Appeal Record re 418 Notice of Appeal filed by William  M. Windsor. Case Appealed to USCA Case Number 09-13086-D. (fem) (Entered:  08/25/2009)
e.       After #758: 04/14/2010 CERTIFICATE OF READINESS of Appeal Record re 726 Notice of Appeal,, filed by William M. Windsor. Case Appealed to USCA Case Number 10-10139-AA. (fem) (Entered 04/14/2010)
f.        After #797: 01/21/2011 CERTIFICATE OF READINESS of Appeal Record re 808 Notice of Appeal, filed by  William M. Windsor, 847 Notice of Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor, 898 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor, 965 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor, 919 Notice of Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor, 850 Notice of Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor, 766 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor, 805 Notice of Appeal, filed by William M. Windsor, 780 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor, 890 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor, 894 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor. Case Appealed to USCA Case Number 10-11758; 10-11981; 10-12515; 10-12516; 10-12731; 10-15587. (fem) (Entered: 01/21/2011)
Conclusions:
1.      For all the reasons listed above, the PACER records and the Docket of the US District Court in this case, as a whole, cannot be deemed as valid judicial records.
2.      A PACER docket was meticulously constructed, including hundreds of papers, to appear as a valid docket of the US District Court.
3.      Defendant Windsor was therefore asked to obtain copies of the NEFs of key docket records and a copy of the Judgment Index, in order to conclusively establish whether the docket in this case in fact is Fraud on the Court by Judge Orinda D Evans and Clerk of the Court James N. Hatten.
4.      The nature of conduct of the US Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit in this matter remains to be examined. [[ii]]
5.      The nature of the US Supreme Court's conduct in this matter was opined as Fraud by Clerk William Suter. [[iii],[iv],[v],[vi]]

LINKS

[i] Zernik, J; The Clerks and the Calendars of the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/42686043/
[ii]12-12-11 Maid of the Mist Corporation et al v William Windsor (10-10139) in the US Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit: Compiled Records of Appeal s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45080970/
[iii] [3] 11-01-18 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist in the Supreme Court of the United States and Alleged Corruption of the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47146842/
[iv] 11-02-10 Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation (10-690 and 10-A690) - Fraud opined in US Supreme Court records, received by Mr Windsor from office of Clerk Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48596120/
[v] 11-01-28 William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690) in the Supreme Court of the United States: a) Suggested request for a valid record of denial, certified by Justice Thomas, and b) Records provided on January 28, 2011 by Mr Windsor s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47773731/
[vi] 11-02-10 Press Release: Fraud Opined in US Supreme Court Records Received by Petitioner William Windsor From the Office of Clerk Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48605325/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine