.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Thursday, February 17, 2011

11-02-09 US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Pretense Appeal // Corte de Apelaciones de EE.UU., 9 º Circuito Insiste en la realización de un Recurso pretenciones // 美国上诉法院第九巡回坚持开展的幌子上诉


 Larger view                 
9th Circuit Judges: William Canby, Jr_ _Edward Leavy 



'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' - the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court


The Motion to Intervene took no position on the controversial 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy itself.  Instead, the Motion to Intervene was filed as a protest of the pattern of conduct of the US courts - publication of false and deliberately misleading dockets of proceedings that are clearly never held valid court proceedings by the US courts themselves. 


Los Angeles, February 17  the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit has posted an unsigned order, bearing the names of Circuit Judges Canby and Leavy, denying Dr Joseph Zernik's Motion to Intervene.  
The Motion to Intervene pointed out the invalidity of the October 2010 purported Judgment from the US District Court, Central District of California, in which the appeal had originated.  The Motion to Intervene called upon the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
  
The October 2010 Judgment of the US District Court could not possibly be deemed a valid judgment pursuant to the law of the United States: 

  • The Clerk of the US District Court has refused to certify the docket of the litigation in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425), and also refused to permit access to the electronic certification of the purported October 2010 Judgment, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights.  The US Court of Appeals holds jurisdiction to conduct appeals only from valid and effectual, certified judgments, not from void ones.
Although no access has been permitted to the certification records, the Motion to Intervene claimed that sufficient evidence is found in the PACER docket of the US District Court to conclude that none of the judicial and clerical records posted in it are valid and effectual: 

  • US Judges George Schiavelli and Virginia Phillips appeared as Presiding Judges in the case, both with no Assignment Orders. Absent Assignment Order in a specific case, a US judge has no authority to adjudicate in the matter.
  • In 2004 Judge Schiavelli issued a purported  judgment in the case, in favor of the United States. The judgment was listed in the PACER docket as "entered", and was listed in the Judgment Index of the Court.
  • Consequently, the case was deemed "closed" by court staff.  However, access to the certification of the 2004 judgment is denied.
  • The 2004 Judge Schiavelli purported Judgment was never overturned through an appeal, or any other judicial proceeding.
  • In 2010 Judge Phillips appeared in the case and issued the opposing purported judgment, in favor of the Log Cabin Republicans. The 2010 judgment was again listed in the PACER docket as "entered", but was not listed in the Judgment Index of the Court. Access to the certification of the 2004 judgment is denied as well.
The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, has also denied a Dr Zernik's request for a statement on the record by Clerk Molly Dwyer, pertaining to the validity of the records in the appeal itself.  

The records in the appeal could not possibly be deemed valid records of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit: 

  • A docket was opened for the appeal from an uncertified judgment.  The Clerk of the US Court of Appeals should have refused to open a docket from an uncertified judgment of the US District Court.
  • The purported orders by the Circuit Judges in the Appeal are all unsigned records.
The Motion to Intervene took no position on the question of the controversial 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy itself.  Instead, the Motion to Intervene was filed as a protest of the pattern of conduct of the US courts from coast to coast, from the US district courts through the US courts of appeals, to the Supreme Court of the United States - publication of false and deliberately misleading PACER dockets of proceedings that are clearly never held valid court proceedings by the US courts themselves. 

The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, continues this pattern in the appeal under Log Cabin Republicans v US et al, insisting on conducting a pretense appeal from a pretense judgment of the US District Court, Central District of California.

LINKS:

[1]10-12-09 Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al (2:04-cv-08425) - Request for Copies of Attestations by the Clerk of the Court s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44963186/
[2]10-12-09 Press Release: Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al (2:04-cv-08425) 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' - Clerk of the US Court asked to provide attestation records, certify the docket 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/44975019/
[3]10-12-12 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (10-56634), (10-56813) - in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit: Notice of Intent to Intervene and Request to Confer s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45138727/
[4] 10-12-12 Press Release: Log Cabin Republicans v USA  'Don't Ask Don't Tell' - Notice of Intent to Intervene Given to Parties in the Appeal s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45149290/
[5] 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/
[6] 11-01-08 Press Release: 
'Don't Ask Don't Tell' - Motion to Intervene, Requesting the US Court of Appeals to Dismiss the Appeals from an Uncertified Judgment, was Posted in the Docket, is Now Pending before the Court-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46528428/
[7] 11-01-21 Press Release: Log Cabin Republicans Oppose Challenge to Validity of the Judgment in the 
'Don't Ask Don't Tell' Litigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47323956/
[8] 11-01-21 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (10-56634, 10-56813) - Log Cabin Republicans Oppose Challenge to Validity of the Judgment in the 
'Don't Ask Don't Tell' Litigation: Opposition (Dkt #49), and Order (Dkt #52)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47323178/
[9] 11-01-23 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (10-56634, 10-56813) Zernik's Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene as filed and served

http://www.scribd.com/doc/47400611/
[10] 11-01-23 Press Release: 
'Don't Ask Don't Tell' Litigation  reply claims Log Cabin Republicans' opposition to intervention amounted to "hand-waving arguments".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47402283/
[11] 11-01-23 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (10-56634, 10-56813): Zernik's Request for Statement on the Record by Clerk Molly C Dwyer in re: Dockets of the Appeals
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47400826/
[12]11-01-27 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-(10-56634) - Dkt 054-056: Zernik's a) Reply in support of Motion to Intervene, b) Request for Statement by Clerk Dwyer, as posted in the PACER docket s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47983546/
[13] Press Release: 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit: Request for Verification of the Dockets Validity by Clerk Molly Dwyer is Posted by the Court

http://www.scribd.com/doc/47992867/
[14] 11-02-09 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634,10-56813) in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit  Unsigned Order Denying the Motion to Intervene

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49068718/

9 comments:

  1. I can't read lawyerese
    Posted 13 hours ago by "Nurb" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Quoted comment: I can't read lawyerese
    ___
    OK, I hope that you understand a bit of economics:

    The US courts from top to bottom are cheating, running trials and appeals that don't look even remotely like anything that follows US law.

    The US courts today are deregulated courts, following free market forces...

    However, they forgot to give notice to the people of the United States of deregulation of the US courts.

    jz
    Posted 8 hours ago by "jz12345" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well I can understand that... The supreme court got a pay raise from their bosses to overturn campaign finance
    Posted 8 hours ago by "Nurb" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  4. The 9th Circus Court needs to move to a taliban controlled village
    Posted 1 hour ago by "angeldelamort" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  5. so basically the court system is either broken or completely corrupt is that the gist of this article i gotta say im not a lawyer so most of this article is pretty opaque can the poster put a conclusion that explains their position and let me know what the purpose of this article is.
    Posted 1 hour ago by "shiels" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't understand this.
    I want to, I just don't.

    I would add randomly, that I see absolutely no reason to make the US Military reflective of US demographics.

    Our military is not a social experiment..
    Posted 29 mins ago by "wharris" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Let me try again:

    The posting is not about gays in the military, but about corruption of the US courts at the highest levels.

    You can think about it as theater or the movies: The judges got the set at their disposal, they got the wardrobe, they got the props, they got the extras. But nothing is real...

    This analysis is not based on legal examination of the arguments and the decisions, but on simple clerical analysis of the papers: The court records in the case are not signed by judges and clerks in a manner that would be required for real court papers.

    The practice is widespread in the US Courts today and often result in abuse of the people. It is also at the foundation of the breakdown of banking regulation.

    Here we have a high visibility case, which has substantial effect on the military. It was widely reported by mainstream media. Regardless, no media reported the fact that the court papers were uniformly defective.

    IN SHORT: The system is thoroughly corrupt, and media cover it up.

    Joseph Zernik, PhD
    Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    Posted very recently by "jz12345" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry for not getting it.
    You are now scaring the crap outta me.

    Posted 3 hours ago by "wharris" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Quoted comment:
    Sorry for not getting it.
    You are now scaring the crap outta me.
    _____

    You should be scared as well...

    Conditions like that have not been seen in the US courts for about a century:

    In the early 20th century conditions in the US courts were described in the US congress as a "burlesque". We are at the same place now.

    Not by chance the period was also called "The Robber Barons Era". Banks and large corporations robbed the people silly. It was characterized by extreme instability of financial markets, which terned into the Great Depression.

    It started in the United States, but affected the entire world economy.

    It was accompanied by extreme impoverishment of the people of the United States...

    It took about half a century and a world war to fix.

    Does that remind you of anything?
    JZ
    Posted very recently by "jz12345" (R)

    ReplyDelete

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine