page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):


Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Sunday, February 6, 2011

11-02-06 Corruption of the Courts and the Legal Profession in California - from discussion group // La corrupción de los Juzgados y la Profesión Legal en California // 腐败法庭和加州法律职业

California former Chief Justice Ronald George

1) Joseph Zernik wrote
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:47:46
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik 
Subject: RE: You Name ‘Em,  We’ll  Shame  ‘ Em


More on the subject....

1) Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)Mr Carrizosa was the person who communicated with me, and inadvertently created the incriminating record regarding false engagement of Attorney Kevin McCormick to appear in Fine v Sheriff - the Habeas Corpus of Richard Fine - on behalf of Judge David Yaffe, where McCormick filed false declaration, false records, etc, to affect continued holding, alleged false imprisonment, of Richard Fine.

Request that was filed with Chief Justice Ronald George to initiate corrective actions remains unanswered...

2) Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550)In Zernik v Connor et al, where Zernik filed complaint against 10 judges of LASC, detailing conduct that should be deemed as racketeering, it is alleged that the California Judicial Council, chaired by Ronald George, engaged in the same pattern of conduct - engaging Attorney Sarah Overton (
Cummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates) to falsely appear on behalf of the judges, "with no communication with clients".  Attorney Overton filed false declarations, false records, to affect continued conduct, alleged racketeering, by the LASC judges.

However, after the experience of correspondence regarding the engagement of McCormick in Fine v Sheriff, Mr Carrizosa and the California Judicial Council refused to respond at all on the subject...
Consequently, conduct of the California Judicial Council and Chief Justice Ronald George were subject of a complaint with the US Attorney's Office of Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights.





http://www.scribd.com/doc/28645522/10-03-19b-Richard-Fine-Dr-Zernik-Mr-Carrizosa-s-Correspondence-on-behalf-of-the-California-Judicial-Council-in-re-Case-Caption-in-engagement-of-Attorney Kevin McCormick


http://www.scribd.com/doc/28821400/10-03-23-Richard-Fine-Request-Chief-Justice-Ronald-George-Investigation-Corrective-Actions-in-Conduct-of-Attorney-Kevin-McCormick-on-Behalf-of-the-California Judicial Council

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29956509/10-04-14-Mr-Carrizosa-and-California-Judicial-Council-refuse-to-respond-regarding-engagement-of-Attorney-Sarah-Overton-by-the-Council-under-Zernik-v-Connor et al


2)  G wrote
At 07:36 PM 2/6/2011, G wrote:
In '94 or '95, []  filed a cert petition in the USSC, In the Matter of the Verified Accusation [VA] of Attorney GARY L. ZERMAN vs. Attorneys R. BROWNE GREENE and MELVIN M. BELLI, Case No. 94-1704, which raised two (2) issues:  1) the CSC systematically summarily denying VAs, in total disregard of statutory law (B&P Codesections 6108, et. seq., particularly sec. 6109)[ and, 2) ignoring a disqualifying conflict of interest re issue no. 1, above.

As par for the course, the USSC issued two words:  Petition Denied.

[] put in the cert petition, that [] spoke with a Mr. Philip Carrizosa, who has reported on the CSC for the LA Daily Journal for 15-years, and he stated that he had seen and reviewed "hundreds" of VAs filed in the CSC over that time, but had "never" seen the CSC grant "even one", yet "many" appeared "to have merit".   Petitioner asked Mr. Carrizosa (twice) to provide a declaration to support this petition; he declined stating "my editor won't let me."14

14 Mr. Carrizosa made the same statement to attorney John DeRonde, regarding VA, S037043, that he filed against attorney Thomas Pfalzer in the CSC, which also was summarily denied despite indisputable serious attorney misconduct.  Also see Va S042880 against attorneys Donna Peizer and Sandra McNabb, which was filed in October 1994, there CSC has not acted yet, as required by sec. 6109.  Seeattorney Discipline and the California Supreme Court:  Transfer of Direct Review to the Courts of Appeal, (1984) 72 C.L.R. 252, 258, ft 47, which references a 1983 article by Mr. Carrizosa on the CSC."

The last I knew, Mr. Carrizosa was working for the Cal. Judicial Council.  [].     

3) Joseph Zernik wrote
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 06:29:09 +0200
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: jz12345@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: FW: You Name ‘Em, We’ll Shame ‘Em : 

Hi Gary:

You get into an interesting question: The ownership/control of the Daily Journal.  Per hearsay, the Daily Journal is controlled by the California Bar.  A few years ago, I communicated in writing and by phone with the Editor in Chief of the Daily Journal.

However, after I discovered and published the fact that the Daily Journal is the whole owner of SUSTAIN, maker of the case management system of the LA Superior Court (opined as fraud).  Nobody in Daily Journal agreed to talk with me again.

Do you have any documents regarding the presumed control of the Daily Journal by the California Bar?

4) G wrote
At 08:17 PM 2/2/2011, you wrote: 
Check out the article in the below link, re the proposed rule by the Florida bar.
As they say, it's not so much what you know, but who you know.  And moreover, those in power want to keep us out of the know - as in the dark to their back room brokered corrupt power deals.
Have you seen any of the info re the Dole case (mentioned in the below article), where Girardi, Lack and Miller filed a brief in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that was found to be fraudulent?  Girardi was serving on the Judicial Council, chaired by Chief Justice Ronald George when that occurred.  Miller was the Cal State Bar president and was or is an editor at the Daily Journal (legal paper of record for LA & many other Cal cities).  George was/is on the advisory board of the California Lawyer magazine, which is owned by the Daily Journal.  G.
5) R wrote

Subject: You Name ‘Em, We’ll Shame ‘Em: 
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:19:08

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -