.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Sunday, January 23, 2011

‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Litigation – Reply claims Log Cabin Republicans’ opposition to intervention amounted to “hand-waving arguments”.


Press Release 
'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Litigation - Reply claims Log Cabin Republicans' opposition to intervention amounted to 'hand-waving arguments'.
In their opposition to the Motion to Intervene, the Log Cabin Republicans failed to do the obvious - produce the Certificate of the October 2010 Judgment. Of significance also is the lack of opposition to the intervention by the US Department of Justice, and the ongoing refusal of the US District Court to produce the Certificate.
Los Angeles, January 23 -  in his Motion to Intervene, [1] Dr Joseph Zernik of Human Rights Alert (NGO) challenged the validity of the US District Court's October 2010 Judgment in Log Cabin Republicans v USA, pertaining to the US Armed Services policy of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'.

Dr Zernik informed the Court of Appeals that the litigation of Log Cabin Republicans v USA in the US District Court was conducted in apparent violation of Due Process and First Amendment rights, and should be deemed invalid:

*        No Certification was filed of the October 2010 Judgment; absent such certification, the Judgment should be deemed null and void.

*        The Clerk of the US District Court refuses to produce a copy of the Certificate, in apparent violation of First Amendment right, to access court records to inspect and to copy.

*        The Clerk of the US District Court also refuses to certify the docket of the case.

Even absent the Certificate of the October 2010 Judgment, Dr Zernik provided evidence from the US District Court's docket that the litigation in Log Cabin Republicans v USA should be deemed invalid from start to end:
*        Two US Judges appeared in the case, both with no Assignment Orders. Absent Assignment Order in a specific case, a US judge has no authority to adjudicate in the matter.
*        In 2004 Judge Schiavelli issued a judgment in the case, in favor of the United States. The judgment was listed in the docket as "entered", and was listed in the Judgment Index of the Court. Consequently, the case was deemed "closed" by court staff.
*        The 2004 Judge Schiavelli Judgment was never overturned through an appeal, or any other judicial proceedings.
*        In 2010 Judge Phillips appeared in the case and issued the opposing judgment, in favor of the Log Cabin Republicans. The 2010 judgment was again listed in the docket as "entered", but was not listed in the Judgment Index of the Court.

Attorneys for the Log Cabin Republicans filed on January 11, 2011, their opposition to Zernik's Motion to Intervene. [2] The succinct opposition states:  "Proposed Intervenor Zernik has no known connection to this case, nor any known interest therein...  Neither party has invited the participation of this individual".

Zernik has now filed his reply to the Log Cabin Republicans opposition. [3] Dr Zernik claimed that the Log Cabin Republicans opposition lacked in substance and amounted to 'hand-waving arguments':

*        The Log Cabin Republicans' opposition failed to do the obvious - produce a valid Certificate of the October 2010 Judgment.  It never provided any explanation for the refusal to produce the Certificate, either.

*          The Log Cabin Republicans' opposition failed to provide any legal basis for the notion that intervention in the US courts was by party's invitation only.

*          The Log Cabin Republicans' opposition failed to address Zernik's claims of interest in the case, and the interest of any person residing under the 9th Circuit in integrity of litigation in the US District Courts.

In particular, the Log Cabin Republicans may find themselves now inconsistent with their basic position regarding the underlying 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy.  Their objection to 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' was founded on allegations of abuse of the Civil Rights of gays in the Armed Services.  The Log Cabin Republicans' opposition to the Motion to Intervene never challenged the alleged violations of Due Process and First Amendment rights that were inherent to the conduct of the litigation in the US District Court itself.

Conduct of fair hearings in national tribunals for protection of rights are among the fundamental Human Rights pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - ratified International Law.

Zernik's reply also informed the Court of Appeals of the significance of the lack of response on the Motion to Intervene by others:

*        The US Department of Justice, which filed its own appeal in the matter, has not opposed the Motion to Intervene, inherent to which was a request to dismiss the appeals.

*        The US District Court itself continues to refuse to produce a Certificate for the October 2010 Judgment.

The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, issued a January 18, 2011 Order stating:

                The pending motions by proposed intervenor Joseph Zernik shall be addressed in a separate order.

Notice was given to the US Congress Committees on the Judiciary, Armed Services, and the House Rules Committee.

________

LINKS:[1] 11-01-08 Press Release: 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' - Motion to Intervene, Requesting the US Court of Appeals to Dismiss the Appeals from an Uncertified Judgment, was Posted in the Docket, is Now Pending before the Court-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46528428/
[2] 11-01-21 Press Release: Log Cabin Republicans Oppose Challenge to Validity of the Judgment in the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Litigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47323956/
[3] 11-01-23 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (10-56634, 10-56813) Zernik's Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene as filed and served
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47400611/
________
Human Rights Alert - NGO
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
______
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/

1 comment:

  1. Comments from the LIVELEAK.COM site:
    ____
    can you put this in Laymen terms?
    Posted 5 hours ago by "DarkPsyOps" (R)
    ____
    Dear DarkPsyOps:

    It is obvious that others figured out the meaning of the report. However, I take it that your comment was entered in good faith.

    The clerks of the US courts take Oath of Office to maintain honest court records.

    Review of the records of the US Court of Appeals, 9th circuit, in the appeals from Log Cabin Republican v USA et al raise serious doubts regarding integrity of the records.

    Therefore, the Clerk of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, Molly C Dwyer, is asked to provide a declaration under penalty of perjury, whether the dockets in the appeals were indeed honest and valid dockets of the court.

    Comprende?
    Posted 2 hours ago by "jz12345" (R)
    ____
    I comprende Ese`.

    I honestly just didnt want to read 15 paragraphs, when im sure it can be summed up into a few sentances.
    Posted 1 hour ago by "DarkPsyOps"
    ____
    Given the nature of the claims against a court that is second only to the Supreme Court of the United States, I felt a need to give some details and some links to records.
    jz
    Posted 40 mins ago by "jz12345" (R)
    ____
    Here is a good summary in just a few sentences...

    Dr. Zernik is a pro-se litigant that does not understand how the legal system works or what constitutes "valid" orders, service and other filings -- let alone local rules v motion practices v rules of procedure (criminal and/or civil). He's had a beef that looks like it stems from misunderstanding what a "notice of electronic filing" is that has morphed into a general (if particularized) distrust of all federal courts' docketing and records systems. That's it in a nutshell. This, like almost all of Dr. Zernik's writing on the matter, is incoherent -- even if it is all done in earnest misunderstanding.
    Posted 17 mins ago by "SheilaMcGill"
    ____
    Dear Sheila:
    Perhaps you could be more specific...

    For your edification, both nationally and internationally renowned experts support my claims of widespread fraud in the case management and online public access systems of the state and federal courts...

    One of them, James Wedick is an FBI veteran and Fraud Expert, who was decorated by US Congress, FBI Director, and US Attorney General for his accomplishment in law enforcement.

    You can view the list of my opinions of fraud in government and corporate computers, and expert opinions in support thereof at:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/

    All the best,

    Joseph Zernik, PhD
    Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    Posted very recently by "jz12345"

    ReplyDelete

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine