page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):


Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Saturday, January 29, 2011

11-01-29 Windsor v Maid of the Mist (10-A690) in the US Supreme Court – Opined as “Shell Game Fraud” by the Court // Fraude en los EE.UU. Corte Suprema de Justicia // 欺诈在美国最高法院

"Maybe Justice Thomas indeed denied your application, may not... maybe there is a valid record of the denial, certified by Justice Thomas, may there is none... what form the records of the US Supreme Court are in, the People are not permitted to know...."

Justice Clarence Thomas and Clerk William Suter
US Supreme Court
Los Angeles, January 29, 2011 - earlier this week Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO) has  filed request with the US Congress for impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter. [[i]] The request was based on allegations of violations of the Oath of Office and deprivation of rights by Clerk Suter:

  • Denial of the rights to access Supreme Court record (both paper and electronic) to inspect and to copy;
  • Denial of the right for valid notice and service of orders and decisions of the Court.
The request for impeachment was based on analysis of:
  • Letters, received by applicants and petitioners in a series of cases, where individuals alleged abuse by government or by large corporations, and
  • Denial of access to the Supreme Court files in the same cases.  
 Of particular concern were cases, which originated from Habeas Corpus petitions, or allegations of corruption of the lower courts.

On Friday, January 28, Mr Windsor, the applicant in one of the cases, provided Dr Zernik with a series of new records, which he had received by mail from the office of Clerk Suter over the previous two weeks. [[ii]] 
Upon review of the new records, Dr Zernik, suggested that a January 13, 2011 letter, signed by Staff Attorney Danny Bickell, purporting to notice the denial of Mr Windsor's application on the same date by Justice Thomas, was likely to be a case of fraud by the Court.  Dr Zernik is not an attorney, but he has accumulated extensive experience in analyzing fraud in the state and US courts, and his opinions were often supported by leading national and international experts in the related fields. [[iii]]
The reasons for the suspicion of fraud by the Court in the January 13, 2011 letter were the following:
  • Bickell is not Deputy Clerk. 
  • Bickell did not sign the January 13, 2011, as "Deputy Clerk", either. 
  • Therefore, the January 13, 2011, letter should not be deemed as a valid notice by the office of Clerk Suter. 
  • No valid record, certified by Justice Thomas was attached to the January 13, 2011 letter by Bickell.
  • Similar letters, which were issued by Bickell in other cases, had no foundation in valid records in US Supreme Court paper files.
  • Unauthorized conduct by Mr Bickell in other cases, which was the basis for a July 2010 complaint of public corruption and deprivation of rights. [[iv]]   
In order to disambiguate the nature of the conduct of the office of Clerk Suter in Mr Windsor's application (10-A690), Dr Zernik suggested that Mr Windsor file a request with Justice Thomas.  The suggested request is for Due Process notice and service of whatever Justice Thomas and Clerk Suter consider the valid record, certified by Justice Thomas, of the January 13, 2011 denial of Mr Windsor's application.

Dr Zernik noted that inherent to the suspected fraud by the court in the case, are the vague and ambiguous conditions, which were created in the US Supreme Court, following the transitions to electronic management: 
  • The office of Clerk Suter has recently denied access to the paper files in a series of cases, including an application by Mr Windsor (10-A404).  
  • Previous inspections of US Supreme Court files demonstrated that no valid records are maintained in the paper court files any longer.  
  • The office of Clerk Suter entirely denies access to electronic court file records.
  • The US Supreme Court has failed to publish any rules pertaining to the nature of its electronic records and valid certifications by the justices in them.
Dr Zernik opined that such vague and ambiguous conditions of the US Supreme Court records, in themselves, amount to "Shell Game Fraud", or a "Confidence Trick".

Dr Zernik concluded his January 29 letter to Mr Windsor:

Maybe Justice Thomas indeed denied your application, may not... maybe there is a valid record of the denial, certified by Justice Thomas, may there is none... what form the records of the US Supreme Court are in, the People are not permitted to know.... 

[i] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter
[ii] 11-01-29 William M. Windsor v. Maid of the Mist Corporation, at al. (10-A690) in the Supreme Court of the United States: a) Suggested request for a valid record of denial, certified by Justice Thomas, and b) Records provided on January 28, 2011 by Mr Windsor
[iii] 11-01-06 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
[iv] 10-07-01 Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -