page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):


Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

11-01-25 Request Filed for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter // Solicitud presentada por juicio político de los EE.UU. Secretario de la Corte Suprema William Suter // 要求提交了弹劾美国最高法院书记威廉苏特


The office of Clerk of the Court William Suter denies applicants and petitioners, as well as the public at large, the right to distinguish, which cases were duly reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States, and which ones were not.

Los Angeles, January 25 –Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO) has filed a request with the US Congress Judiciary Committees and the House Rules Committee for impeachment of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court for violations of his Oath of Office. 

Third party declarations regarding repeated failed attempts to discover any valid judicial records in the paper court files, and entire denial of access to the electronic records of the Court, as well as records, which were served by the office of Clerk William Suter on petitioners and applicants, have been provided as the core evidence for the request. 

The request alleges that the office of Clerk William Suter routinely violates the First Amendment right to inspect and to copy court records and the Due Process right for notice and service. 

The request alleges that Clerk William Suter denies applicants and petitioners, as well as the public at large, the right to distinguish, which cases were duly reviewed by the Court, and which ones were not. Such conduct renders judicial proceedings of the highest court of the land vague and ambiguous. 

The conduct of Clerk William Suter should be considered of the highest public policy significance, because of the nature of the cases that are listed in the request, petitions and applications for the protection of their rights against alleged abuse by government and by large corporations. Some of the cases, ranging from 2007 to 2011, also pertain to matters, which are noted in the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations as “corruption of the courts” [2] and denial of the right for Habeas Corpus in the United States. [3] 

The conduct of Clerk William Suter is alleged in the request as violation of his Oath of Office, and violation of his duties and obligations pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1789, including, but not limited to: denial of Access to Justice, denial of Equal Protection, Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law, and/or Misprision of Felonies; therefore - impeachable offences. 

Additional measures are proposed in the request for restoring the integrity of the offices of the clerks of the US courts. The US Congress enacted laws, presidential directives were issued, regulations were promulgated, and systems were implemented for authentication and validation of e-government in the Executive Branch. In contrast, the US courts implemented electronic court systems and electronic court records with no legal foundation. Therefore, the request also urges the US Congress to enact federal rules of electronic courts. 

Regardless, the request notes that no measure can substitute for vigilance of the public at large, and computing professionals in particular, in “keeping a watchful eye” on the courts. 

Notice was given to the United Nations Human Rights Council, in view of the pending final vote on the 2010 UPR of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations. 
[1] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER 
[2] 10-11-10 United Nations Human Rights Council, Human Rights Working Group: Outcome Document of the 2010 UPR of the United States: Wg.6 9 l.9 USA 
[3] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report 

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States. 

Locations of visitors to this page
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations." 
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute 
* "Innocent people remain in prison" 
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." 
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) 
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." 
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001) 
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." 
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) 
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." 


    Bill Richardson, New Mexico Democratic Governor, nominated for Commerce Department Secretary. He withdrew on January 4 after it emerged that he was the subject of a Grand Jury investigation for influence peddling, due to his awarding of a $1.5 million state contract to political contributors.

    Tom Daschle, Former South Dakota Democratic Senator, nominated for Health and Human Services Secretary. He withdrew on February 3, admitting that he had failed to pay more than $100,000 in taxes on a car and driver provided by a friend and on consulting fees after he left the Senate.

    Nancy Killefer, former Assistant Secretary for Management and Chief Financial Officer of the Treasury Department during the Clinton administration, nominated for Deputy Director at the Office of Management and Budget and Chief Performance Officer. Killefer withdrew on February 3 because of a lien against her home for failure to pay unemployment tax for household help.

    Hilda Solis, nominated for Labor Secretary, was confirmed on February 11 even though her husband had liens against his business going back 16 years. He paid $6,400 owed a day before her confirmation hearing.

    Timothy Geithner, nominated and confirmed on February 24 for Treasury Secretary. Geithner failed to pay $34,000 in self-employment taxes while he worked at the International Monetary Fund from 2001 to 2004. Yet he was still confirmed because Democrats said his position was too important to be left unfilled any longer.

    Former Obama campaign worker Susan Tierney, the leading candidate for Deputy Secretary of Energy, dropped out on March 3 without citing a reason. Is she afraid to cite back taxes?

    Jane Garvey, reportedly Obama's top choice for Deputy Secretary of Transportation, also dropped out on March 3, reportedly for financial reasons.

    Former Washington Democratic Governor Gary Locke. Nominated on March 5, for Secretary of Commerce after Bill Richardson and Judd Gregg withdrew. So far he appears to be sailing through to confirmation, but Frontpage Mag points out he was involved in Chinagate with former Clinton
    Commerce employee John Huang. Huang wrote a $1,000 check to Locke and co-sponsored fundraising.

    Annette Nazareth, who was to be nominated for Treasury Deputy Secretary, abruptly announced on March 5 she was stepping aside for "personal reasons."

    Caroline Atkinson, nominated for Undersecretary of International Affairs, abruptly withdrew on March 5 as well.

    Because of the long list of nominees who withdrew for tax problems, their withdrawals are forever tainted with a cloud of suspicion.

    Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Obama's first pick for Surgeon General, withdrew on March 5 without citing a reason. Sources close to the Dr. hinted that he did not want his name associated with a failing administration that is increasingly percieved as corrupt.

    Former Dallas Democratic Mayor Ron Kirk, nominated for Trade Representative, failed to pay $10,000 in back taxes for speaking fees over three years. He faced Senate questioning on March 9 over it, but is expected to win confirmation. He has agreed to pay $9,975 in back taxes from 2005-2007.

    Posted 2 hours ago by "KronosTitan" (R)

  2. Comment by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
    Demands and refusal of Mr William Suter to produce a copy of his Oath of Office:
    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/nad.oath.suter.htm (PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT)
    http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/final.nad.oath.suter.htm (PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT)


Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -