.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

CFR Newsletter: Congress May Prevent Transfer of Guantanamo Detainees to the US // Boletín CFR: Congreso puede impedir la transferencia de detenidos de Guantánamo a los EE.UU.

Is this forum shopping, or what?
_____
 

Top of the Agenda: Verdict Tests Guantanamo Policy

Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, the first former Guantanamo Bay detainee to be tried in federal criminal court, was found guilty of a single count of conspiracy to damage or destroy U.S. property (WashPost) but acquitted of numerous murder and attempted murder charges for his role in the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa. The outcome was a clear setback for the Obama administration, which could be hard pressed to fulfill its promise to try other Guantanamo detainees in U.S. civilian courts and not rely exclusively on the military commissions set up under the George W. Bush administration.
Several incoming Republican leaders in the U.S. House– including Lamar Smith of Texas, set to be Judiciary Committee chairman, and Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, expected chairman of the Intelligence Committee –denounced the use of civilian courts for prosecuting terrorism cases (NYT). New York Rep. Peter King, expected to become the next chairman of the House homeland security committee, called the verdict a "total miscarriage of justice." He says Congress must approve any further transfers of Guantánamo Bay prisoners to the United States (Guardian), which is unlikely to happen once his party takes control of the House.
Analysis:
In this CFR roundup from earlier this year, four experts reviewed the legal and political ramifications of the Obama administration's promise to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay.
CFR's John Bellinger says the Obama administration has found itself struggling through a political and legal thicket about where and how to try those accused of war crimes.
Background:

10-11-30 More on the Los Angeles Rampart scandal (1998-2000) and the Rampart FIPs (1990s - present) // Más sobre el escándalo de Rampart en Los Angeles (1998-2000) y el PFE de Rampart (1990 - presente)

From the OAK discussion board.
1. Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA 9 hours ago
[] 
TIKKUN's Rabbi MICHAEL LERNER, is asked re: The Los Angeles Jewish Community and the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons)
See the full posting under: http://www.scribd.com/doc/44354776/

The question posed to Rabbi Michael Lerner:

Should the Los Angeles Jewish community consider it part of its duties and responsibilities to initiate actions for the release of the Los Angeles Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - mostly black and latinos - victims of conduct of the Los Angeles, California courts?

Posing questions to leading rabbis of the day has been a traditional form of Jewish discourse, going back some 1,500 years. 


2. Comment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 8 hours ago
I recall the Rampart scandal in L. A. resulting in a some cops getting convicted and over 100 convictions obtained by perjury, falsifying evidence etc. being overturned. The traditional hesitancy of the prosecution to free the innocent, like in using D N A to exhonerate, is the doctrine of finality of judgments and no doubt embarassment.
Andrew


3. Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA 53 minutes ago
[] 
Jacqueline Connor
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
[] 
Rafael Perez
Former undercover narcotics officers, LAPD
CENTRAL FIGURES OF THE RAMPART SCANDAL
Dr Jackson:
Again, please check the facts... for your convenience, references were provided in a previous messages. Regardless, you prefer to 'recall' the facts, and grossly misrepresent them.
a) The case of the Rampart FIPs does not involve 100 false convictions through perjury. In fact, the number of the Rampart FIPs was estimated by various groups at 8,000-30,000.
b) The case of the Rampart FIPs does not involve only 'convictions obtained by perjury'. Confessions were extracted through torture, victims in some cases were documented to have been permanently maimed, and others were killed.
Finally, I find objectionable your attempt to find a legal 'doctrine' to justify such conduct. The applicable doctrine is Void not Voidable Judgments. Such judgments are far from final, they are null and void, always were, and always will be.
Finally, the case of 'Kids for Cash' in Luzerne County, PA (2008 to the present), shows that even in the US such facts are recognized. Immediately upon discovery of corruption of the courts in Luzerne County, PA, the PA state court system established a review panel, and initiated efforts to review each and every case of imprisonment by the corrupt courts, leading to the release of thousands of juveniles.
The question, which looms heavy over the Rampart scandal and the Rampart FIPs is the refusal of local, state, and federal agencies to comply with the law and initiate release of the victims... The reasons for such conduct were separately reviewed.
My proposed explanation:
Federal agencies were left incapable of enforcing the law in Los Angeles County, California, after such agencies, led by the CIA, engaged for over a decade (mid 1980s to mid 1990s) in large-scale drug trafficking to LA, as part of the Iran-Contra affair (link was previously provided to a 1997 official US DOJ IG report, so please do not rely on your recollections in the matter),
In running such operation for over a decade, federal agencies had to rely on cooperation by local law enforcement and the courts. Therefore, when confronted with the largest case of corruption of the justice system in the history of the United States, they opted to permit the corrupt local justice system to investigate, prosecute, and adjudge itself, with predictable results - no enforcement of the law at all.
It should be emphasized that the Rampart scandal at its base was centered on the very same type of alleged criminality - control of wholesale drug markets by law enforcement in collusion with the courts.
Joseph Zernik
LINKS
All links were provided in previous postings.

4. Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA


[] 
Jacqueline Connor
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
[] 
Rafael Perez
Former undercover narcotics officers, LAPD
CENTRAL FIGURES OF THE RAMPART SCANDAL
Hi Dr Jackson:
Let me complete the fact corrections for your short piece below.
Your recollection of 'the Rampart scandal in L. A. resulting in a some cops getting convicted' was the contrary to the truth in the matter.
A. THE FIRST RAMPART TRIAL (2000)
In the First Rampart Trial, four of the principles in the ring of undercover narcotics officers were subjected to pretense prosecution.
Judge Jacqueline Connor, who had been The Central Figure in the false convictions, and who had been reputed as close friend of the Defendants, appeared as 'Presiding Judge'.
The absurdity of the situation was noted by newspapers already then:
1) Two years earlier, Jacqueline Connor provided Rafael Perez with a glowing recommendation letter for his promotion, based explicitly on his excellent testimonies in her courtroom. Later he recanted all these testimonies as perjury.
2) A few months before the opening of the trial, and after Perez signed a plea bargain, Connor appeared in an LAPD public function, where his family was present, and from the podium warned him against cooperation with the investigation, and also warned him against ever again appearing in her courtroom.
3) Had it been a true prosecution, Connor would have been required to preside over prosecution, which would have been largely based on elaborating on her own conduct...
Naturally, had Judge Jacqueline Connor been assigned to preside in the First Rampart Trial in compliance with the law, she should have immediately recused.
Various sources say that she appeared as Presiding Judge to protect herself, that there was a lot at stake for her personally in the case.
B. EVENTS THE FOLLOWED:
1) Early on Connor ruled to exclude most of the prosecution's evidence.
2) Through various manipulations, Perez - the main witness - was indeed prevented from appearing in Connor's courtroom and taking the stand.
3) Already then media speculated that the jury would not be able to convict the Defendants under such conditions.
4) Regardless, in October 2000 the jury convicted 3 of the 4 Defendants.
5) On Friday night, December 22, 2000, from home, Judge Jacqueline Connor issued a ruling, which was later described by media as 'unprecedented'. She voided the jury convictions and ordered the release of the three convicted cops, claiming that she had made fatal errors in jury instructions. (So much for the finality of judgments...).
Moreover, in her ruling she appeared to ridicule those who try 'to fix the Rampart'.
6) Later, the three cops, who had been convicted by jury, were paid $15 millions in damages - for being subjected to the prosecution...
C. OUTCOMES
1) The victims remain falsely imprisoned to this date, with a few notable exceptions.
2) Judge Jacqueline Connor continues to preside in both the criminal and civil courts in Los Angeles.
3) Regardless of his plea bargain with California prosecutors, Rafael Perez was subjected to the 'federal option' and served several years in federal prison.  The case follows what became a pattern in recent years across the United States - imprisonment of whisleblowers...
4) The perps were enriched.
____
So much for recollections. We would all be better served by sticking to the facts.
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
______
Human Rights Alert - NGO
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
Locations of visitors to this page
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*    
"Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*  
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*  
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*  
"...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

10-11-30 More on the Los Angeles Rampart scandal (1998-2000) and the Rampart FIPs (1990s - present) // Más sobre el escándalo de Rampart en Los Angeles (1998-2000) y el PFE de Rampart (1990 - presente)

From the OAK discussion board

1. Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA 4 minutes ago 

[] 
Jacqueline Connor
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
[] 
Rafael Perez
Former undercover narcotics officers, LAPD
CENTRAL FIGURES OF THE RAMPART SCANDAL
Hi Dr Jackson:
Let me complete the fact corrections for your short piece below.
Your recollection of 'the Rampart scandal in L. A. resulting in a some cops getting convicted' was the contrary to the truth in the matter.
A. THE FIRST RAMPART TRIAL (2000)
In the First Rampart Trial, four of the principles in the ring of undercover narcotics officers were subjected to pretense prosecution.
Judge Jacquelin Connor, who had been The Central Figure in the false convictions, and who had been reputed as close friend of the Defendants, appeared as 'Presiding Judge'.
The absurdity of the situation was noted by newspapers already then:
1) Two years earlier, Jacqueline Connor provided Rafael Perez with a glowing recommendation letter for his promotion, based explicitly on his excellent testimonies in her courtroom. Later he recanted all these testimonies as perjury.
2) A few months before the opening of the trial, and after Perez signed a plea bargain, Connor appeared in an LAPD public function, where his family was present, and from the podium warned him against cooperation with the investigation, and also warned him against ever again appearing in her courtroom.
3) Had it been a true prosecution, Connor would have been required to preside over prosecution, which would have been largely based on elaborating on her own conduct...
Naturally, had Judge Jacqueline Connor been assigned to preside in the First Rampart Trial in compliance with the law, she should have immediately recused. 
Various sources say that she appeared as Presiding Judge to protect herself, that there was a lot at stake for her personally in the case.
B. EVENTS THE FOLLOWED:
1) Early on Connor ruled to exclude most of the prosecution's evidence.
2) Through various manipulations, Perez - the main witness - was indeed prevented from appearing in Connor's courtroom and taking the stand.
3) Already then media speculated that the jury would not be able to convict the Defendants under such conditions.
4) Regardless, in October 2000 the jury convicted 3 of the 4 Defendants.
5) On Friday night, December 22, 2000, from home, Judge Jacqueline Connor issued a ruling, which was later described by media as 'unprecedented'. She voided the jury convictions and ordered the release of the three convicted cops, claiming that she had made fatal errors in jury instructions. (So much for the finality of judgments...).
Moreover, in her ruling she appeared to ridicule those who try 'to fix the Rampart'.
6) Later, the three cops, who had been convicted by jury, were paid $15 millions in damages - for being subjected to the prosecution...
C. OUTCOMES
1) The victims remain falsely imprisoned to this date, with a few notable exceptions.
2) Judge Jacqueline Connor continues to preside in both the criminal and civil courts in Los Angeles.
3) Regardless of his plea bargain with California prosecutors, Rafael Perez was subjected to the 'federal option' and served several years in federal prison.  The case follows what became a pattern in recent years across the United States - imprisonment of whisleblowers...
____
So much for recollections. We would all be better served by sticking to the facts.
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)

2. Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA 53 minutes ago 

[] 
Jacqueline Connor
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
[] 
Rafael Perez
Former undercover narcotics officers, LAPD
CENTRAL FIGURES OF THE RAMPART SCANDAL
Dr Jackson:
Again, please check the facta... for your convenience, references were provided in a previous messages. Regardless, you prefer to 'recall' the facts, and grossly misrepresent them.
a) The case of the Rampart FIPs does not involve 100 false convictions through perjury. In fact, the number of the Rampart FIPs was estimated by various groups at 8,000-30,000.
b) The case of the Rampart FIPs does not involve only 'convictions obtained by perjury'. Confessions were extracted through torture, victims in some cases were documented to have been permanently maimed, and others were killed.
Finally, I find objectionable your attempt to find a legal 'doctrine' to justify such conduct. The applicable doctrine is Void not Voidable Judgments. Such judgments are far from final, they are null and void, always were, and always will be.
Finally, the case of 'Kids for Cash' in Luzerne County, PA (2008 to the present), shows that even in the US such facts are recognized. Immediately upon discovery of corruption of the courts in Luzerne County, PA, the PA state court system established a review panel, and initiated efforts to review each and every case of imprisonment by the corrupt courts, leading to the release of thousands of juveniles.
The question, which looms heavy over the Rampart scandal and the Rampart FIPs is the refusal of local, state, and federal agencies to comply with the law and initiate release of the victims... The reasons for such conduct were separately reviewed.
My proposed explanation: 
Federal agencies were left incapable of enforcing the law in Los Angeles County, California, after such agencies, led by the CIA, engaged for over a decade (mid 1980s to mid 1990s) in large-scale drug trafficking to LA, as part of the Iran-Contra affair (link was previously provided to a 1997 official US DOJ IG report, so please do not rely on your recollections in the matter),
In running such operation for over a decade, federal agencies had to rely on cooperation by local law enforcement and the courts. Therefore, when confronted with the largest case of corruption of the justice system in the history of the United States, they opted to permit the corrupt local justice system to investigate, prosecute, and adjudge itself, with predictable results - no enforcement of the law at all.
It should be emphasized that the Rampart scandal at its base was centered on the very same type of alleged criminality - control of wholesale drug markets by law enforcement in collusion with the courts.
Joseph Zernik
LINKS
All links were provided in previous postings.

3. Comment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 8 hours ago 

I recall the Rampart scandal in L. A. resulting in a some cops getting convicted and over 100 convictions obtained by perjury, falsifying evidence etc. being overturned. The traditional hesitancy of the prosecution to free the innocent, like in using D N A to exhonerate, is the doctrine of finality of judgments and no doubt embarassment.
Andrew

4. Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA 9 hours ago

[] 
TIKKUN's Rabbi MICHAEL LERNER, is asked re: The Los Angeles Jewish Community and the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons)
[See under: http://www.scribd.com/doc/44354776/]

Monday, November 29, 2010

10-11-29 TIKKUN's Rabbi MICHAEL LERNER, is asked re: The Los Angeles Jewish Community and the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) // El rabino Michael Lerner, se preguntó sobre la comunidad judía de Los Ángeles y el PFE de Rampart (Personas Falsamente Encarceladas)

[] [] 
Rabbi Michael Lerner, Editor - Tikkun Magazine (to heal, repair, and transform the world)


Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)

RE: TIKKUN's Rabbi MICHAEL LERNER, is asked re: The Los Angeles Jewish Community and the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons)


Dear Rabbi Lerner:

Thanks again for your response on the previous question, affirming the ethical duties of Bet Tzedek (The House of Justice) and the Los Angeles Jewish Federation in an unrelated matter.

Here is an question regarding a fundamental issue, which I believe that you could and should address:

1) Should the Los Angeles Jewish community consider it part of its duties and responsibilities to initiate actions for the release of the Los Angeles Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - mostly black and latinos - victims of conduct of the Los Angeles, California courts?



The Los Angeles Jewish community is vastly over-represented among judges and attorneys in Los Angeles, and the ongoing imprisonment of the Rampart-FIPs is contrary to Jewish values and the historic commitment of the Jewish community to Civil Rights in the United States.

The basic facts in the matter were established over a decade ago during the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) and through a series of investigative committee reports that followed: [1] 


  • The number of the Rampart-FIPs is unknown, but was estimated at many thousands [2].
  • The Rampart-FIPs are mostly black and latinos.
  • Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the University of California, Irvine Law School, a renowned Jewish constitutional scholar found the matter sufficiently important that he initiated his own independent investigation of the matter and published his report, stating: "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." (2001) [3]
  • Prof David Burcham, then Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School wrote: "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
  • The Rampart-FIPs were falsely convicted and sentenced to long prison terms through framing of evidence, through extraction of confessions under torture, and through fraud on the courts. 
  • Regardless, local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies have refused to release the victims to this date.  
  • The case was described as the largest court corruption scandal in the history of the US. 
  • The Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) documented that release of the Rampart FIPs is opposed by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court under claims that it would lead to 'collapse of the justice system'[4] - an argument that defies logic and any sense of decency.
I hope that you would find time to respond on this question, helping to repair a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions taking place under our watch, here in California.

Happy Hanukkah to you and your family!

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
WHAT DID THE LAPD BLUE RIBBON REVIEW PANEL REPORT (2006) SAY ABOUT THE RAMPART-FIPs? [4]
*     Innocent people remain in prison.
*     ...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of...http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

WHAT DID PROF ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, DEAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LAW SCHOOL, SAY ABOUT THE RAMPART-FIPs? [2]

*   This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

WHAT DID PROF DAVID BURCHAM, DEAN, LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL, LA SAY ABOUT THE RAMPART FIPs? [3]

*   ...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit.Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA? [5]

*   ...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
WHAT DID THE LATE WILLIAM BRENNAN JR SAY ABOUT HABEAS CORPUS?
*   The basic principle of the Great Writ of habeas corpus is that, in a civilized society... if the imprisonment cannot be shown to conform with the fundamental requirements of law, the individual is entitled to his immediate release.
Fay v Noia (1963)
LINKS:
[1] 09-12-17 Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review
http :// www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/

[2] Rampart False Imprisonments - PBS Frontline (2001), in: Frontline series: LAPD Blues
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24901612/

[3] Chemerinsky, E: The Rampart Scandal and the Criminal Justice System in Los Angeles County, Guild Practitioner 57:121 (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/

[4] Burcham, DW and Fisk, CL: Policing the Justice System, in: Symposium, The Rampart Scandal: Policing the Criminal Justice System, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34:537 (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/

[5] United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report,as part of Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

Human Rights Alert - NGO  
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
Locations of visitors to this page
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://inproperinla.com/
_______________________________________

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine