.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

10-12-14 Alleged Impeachable Misconduct by Judge John Bates - US District Court, DC // Presunta mala conducta juicio político por el juez John Bates - EE.UU. Tribunal de Distrito, DC // 据称法官约翰贝茨弹劾的失当行为-美国联邦地方法院,直流

Judge John Bates


Sieverding et al v. United States Government (1:09-cv-00562) in the US District Court, Washington DC – in re: Arrest and Imprisonment by Federal Agencies

Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act/Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff Sieverding claimed that FBI and other federal agencies created records pertaining to her arrest and imprisonment that were false and deliberately misleading.  Such record reported her as arrested and imprisoned on felony, which she claimed had no basis in reality. 
Moreover, she claimed that such federal agencies failed to produce key records pertaining to her arrest and imprisonment.
The records below document litigation in the US District Court of dubious validity at best.
Records[1]
1)      December 14, 2010 Docket                                                                                 3
2)      December 14, 2010 Judgment Index                                                                       12
3)      June 30, 2010 Related Transactions Report                                                              13
4)      Dkt #001:          March 25, 2009 Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet                          34
5)      Dkt #008:          June 1, 2009 - MOTION to Dismiss Or, Alternatively, For Summary Judgment by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                            83
a.       Dkt #008-1:       Memorandum in Support
b.      Dkt #008-2:       Declaration of William E. Bordley (FILED UNDER SEAL)
c.       Dkt #008-3:       Declaration of Paul Sever
d.      Dkt #008-4:       Declaration Stephen D Wallisch
6)      Dkt #023:          July 23, 2009 - MOTION to Strike MOTION to Dismiss Or, Alternatively, For Summary Judgment, by KAY SIEVERDING                                    130
7)      Dkt #025:          August 28, 2009 - Memorandum in opposition to re (Dkt #023) MOTION to Strike (Dkt #008) MOTION to Dismiss, by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.                                        147
8)      Dkt #032:         August 5, 2009 - MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S DOCUMENT 25 BECAUSE OF PERJURY, by KAY SIEVERDING                         156
9)      Dkt #057:          May 15, 2010 - Order granting 8 the Department of Justice's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment, and addressing pending motions by Judge JOHN D. BATES                                                                                          280
10)  Dkt: #078:         October 19, 2010 - ORDER of USCA – Order granting summary affirmance Not accessible through PACER                                                             281

Of Note:
1)         Docket as a Whole:
a.       The Docket failed to include any of the Attestation/Authentication records by the clerk (NEFs – Notices of Electronic Filing). Therefore, it is impossible to ascertain the validity of the records.
b.      Upon information and belief, Plaintiff Kay Sieverding was never served NEFs in the case, and has never gained access to the NEFs. 
c.       Related Transactions Report:  The Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (Dkt #057) was not docketed as related to the Complaint (Dkt #001), and the Complaint was not docketed as ‘terminated’.
2)      Judgment Index: Failed to record any judgment in the case.
3)      Dkt #001: March 25, 2009 Summons
Summons was not docketed, in apparent violation of FRCivP.
4)      Dkt #001: March 25, 2009 Civil Cover Sheet – not signed by Clerk.
5)      Dkt #?:               No Assignment Order for Judge Judge John D. Bates appears in the docket.
6)      Dkt #008-4: Declaration Stephen D Wallisch
The declaration failed to provide as evidence the arrest and booking records of Kay Sieverding. Instead, the declaration only stated:
9. Relevant and necessary records regarding Ms. Sieverding were prepared and maintained in the USMS Warrant Information Network (WIN) and Prisoner Population Management/Prisoner Tracking Systems (PTS) of records.
7)      Dkt #078: The Order by the US Court of Appeals was filed by the US District Court as a judicial record that was not signed by a Circuit Judge, not authenticated by Clerk of the Court of Appeals, and failed to bear the seal of the US Court of Appeals.
See also:
1)      See also request for NEFs:
2)      See also records pertaining to Sieverding  et al v Colorado Bar Association et al (02-cv-01950) at the US District Court, District of Colorado regarding circumstances of the arrest and imprisonment.
LINKS:
[1] Sieverding et al v. United States Government (1:09-cv-00562) in the US District Court, Washington DC – in re: Arrest and Imprisonment by Federal Agencies

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine