_ _ _ _ _ _BAC President Brian Moynihan; - - - - - -_ - - SEC Chair Mary Schapiro;
_ _ _ _US Judge Jed Rakoff;_ - - - - _ _ US Judge Virginia Phillips;_ _ ___ US Judge John Walter
All three cases originated from matters involving alleged criminality by government officers: The former case - Chair of the Federal Reserved BEN BERNANKE and former Treasury Secretary HENRY PAULSON, and the latter two cases - alleged racketeering by judges of the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
In addition, the first and third cases involved alleged criminality by the most senior officers of Bank of America Corporation - former President KEN LEWIS and current President BRIAN MOYNIHAN.
The cases are:
Most court proceedings were conducted by telephone, and no minutes were entered in the docket for any of the proceedings. Therefore, no individual at all was listed in any court record as Deputy Clerk sitting in such proceedings, and no attestation/authentication records (NEFs) were issued on such off the record proceedings. Neither Summons, nor Civil Cover Sheet were found in the docket. 
The docket sheet of SEC v Bank of America Corporation and the records provided in it, as a whole, included no valid court record bearing a valid signature of a Deputy Clerk, identified as such. The case was extensively reported by mainstream media outlets - falsely represented as the highlight of banking regulation under the current crisis.
Reports, filed for peer-review in an international law journal, provided detailed analysis of the dockets and related PACER records, and opined Fraud on the Court in all three cases, through collusion of US Judges, Clerks of the Courts, and Counsel who appeared in the cases.
The reports further called upon the US Congress to initiate Judicial Reform through:
a) Enactment of federal rules of PACER and CM/ECF, which would restore accountability of the Clerks of the US Courts for electronic court records. Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF by the Administrative Office of the US Courts was opined as central to deterioration of integrity of the US courts. The systems themselves were opined as large-scale computer fraud in a report published in an international, peer-reviewed, computer science journal with Editorial Board listing scholars from six European nations and Canada. 
b) Restoration of key provisions of the Salary Act of 1919 - placing the Clerks of the US Courts under direct authority of the US Attorney General. Yielding of authority over the Clerks of the US Courts to the US judiciary resulted in undermining of their authority and with it - integrity of US court records. 
The reports further opined that absent reform of the US courts, there would not be a way to safeguard Human Rights in the United States, or establish effective Banking Regulation. Conditions, which now prevail in the US courts were opined as amounting to a Robber Baron Revival Era.
LINKS: 10-11-19 Civil Litigation Management Manual, Second Edition (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/43498081/ SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Civil Docket Report
 Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - Civil Docket Report
 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) - Civil Docket Report
 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/ 10-11-17 Duties and Responsibilities of the Clerks � Key to Integrity Failure of the US Courts
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/