.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Monday, November 1, 2010

10-11-02 Case management and online public records of the US and State of California courts - a call for records for a scholarly series


Re: Case management and online public records of the US and State of California courts -  a call for records for a scholarly series
Dear friend:

Your help would be greatly appreciated in providing records of cases of interest in the US and State of California courts. 

The materials are intended for use in an ongoing series of scholarly publications in peer-reviewed international journals, pertaining to the operations of the US and State of California courts from the ministerial perspective in both civil and criminal cases. [1] I am not an attorney, and do not pretend to engage in legal review.  Therefore, the records below [2] are sufficient.  No need for anything else.

Your help in the matter would be greatly appreciated, but never acknowledged.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert - NGO
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
Locations of visitors to this page
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
[1] Ongoing series of scholarly publications in peer-reviewed international journals, pertaining to the operations of the US and State of California courts from the ministerial perspective.
a) Previously published in the series:
i 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty  Online Public Prisoners� Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
ii. 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
iii. 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG)) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
b) Under review:
iv 10-10-30 Zernik, J Case Management and Online Public Access Systems of the Courts in the United States - A Call for Action - pending
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40511204/
c) Planned:
v. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Case studies of Marina v LA County, Sturgeon v LA County, Galdjie v Darwish, and Samaan v Zernik (P1/5)
vi. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Registers of Actions (California Civil Dockets) (P2/5)
vii. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Minutes (P3/5)
viii. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Denial of Access to records as integral to alleged racketeering (P4/5)
ix. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Ambiguation of entry of judgments as integral to alleged racketeering (P5/5)
x. Online public access system of the California Courts of Appeals, 2nd, and 4th District
Case studies of Marina v LA County, Sturgeon v LA County, Galdjie v Darwish, and Samaan v Zernik
xi. PACER and CM/ECF - Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
Case study of SEC v BAC
[2] REQUESTED INFORMATION AND RECORDS:
a. US District Court, <> District of < >

a) Complaint under cause of actions of <>and Summons (or equivalents in criminal cases) with respective NEFs
b) Particular Order of significance with respective NEF (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
c) Dispositive Order with respective NEF. (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
d) Ancillary proceedings Motion (if any) under cause of actions of <>with respective NEF. (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
e) Ancillary proceedings Dispositive Order (if any) with respective NEF. (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
(If more than one judge was involved, please give between the ones above, at least one order/judgment of each of the judges involved.)
(If possible, I would like to have a copy of the orders/judgments in the exact form that they were served by the court - whether it was electronic or paper service.)
b) US Court of Appeals, <> District (Petitions/Appeals)
i. Commencing records (Petition under cause of action of <>/Notice of Appeal, with respective NDA)
ii. Particular Order of significance with respective NDA
iii. Dispositive Order with respective NDA.
(If more than one judge was involved, please give between the ones above, at least one order/judgment of each of the judges involved.)
(If possible, I would like to have a copy of the orders/judgments in the exact form that they were served by the court - whether it was electronic or paper service.)
c) US Supreme Court (Applications/Petitions for)
i. Commencing records (Petition/Application for <>, with respective proof of filing from the office of the clerk)
ii. Particular Order of significance with respective notice and proof of service.
iii. Dispositive Order with respective notice and proof of service.
(If more than one justice was involved, please give between the ones above, at least one order/judgment of each of the judges involved.)
(If possible, I would like to have a copy of the orders/judgments in the exact form that they were served by the court - whether it was electronic or paper service.)


At 01:52 AM 11/2/2010, you wrote:
...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine