page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):


Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

10-07-13 Alleged Fraud by FBI and US Department of Justice on the US Congress in re: Human Rights Policy

FBI Director Robert Mueller 
Fraud Alleged by FBI and US Department of Justice on the US Congress in re: Human Rights Policy
Los Angeles, July 13 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, claimed ongoing fraud by the US Department of Justice and FBI on the US Congress, regarding statements provided to US Congress in both October 2009 testimony by Arthur M. Cummings - FBI Executive Assistant Director, and in August-September 2009 responses on congressional inquiries  by  Kenneth Kaiser - FBI Assistant Director and Kenneth Melson - US Department of Justice Director.
In the October 2009 testimony before US congress, Mr Cummins stated  "
the FBI is committed to supplementing the international community's efforts to advance human rights." However, Human Rights Alert claims that the evidence is overwhelming of ongoing refusal of FBI to protect the Human Rights of the people of the United States.
In the August-September 2009 written responses to congressional inquiries by the Hon Dianne Feinstein and the Hon Diane Watson, FBI Assistant Director - Kenneth Kaiser and US Department of Justice Director - Kenneth Melson denied claims of racketeering by judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, refused to address large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, and denied equal protection for the 10 million residents of the county, including, but not limited the First Amendment right to access court records - to inspect and to copy. 
Human Rights Alert claims that no reasonable person, who would review the record as a whole could honestly deny racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. 
The large-scale false imprisonments, were inherent to the claims of racketeering, and were documented in both official and unofficial reports already a decade ago.  Regardless, the victims were never released to this date. Moreover, data recently compiled by Human Rights Alert documented continuance of the pattern of false arrests and false imprisonments by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the Los Angeles Superior Court.
The denial of access to court records in Los Angeles County is incontrovertible.  Access to court records - to inspect and to copy, is a fundamental of Due Process and Fair Hearings, and is also recognized in US law as part of the First Amendment.
Combined, Human Rights Alert claims that the conduct of FBI and US Department of Justice demonstrates a pattern of refusal to safeguard of the Human Rights of the people, while providing false and deliberately misleading statements to the US Congress, where US executive officers claim the opposite.
Consequently, complaints were filed in late 2009 with Glenn A Fine - US Department of Justice Inspector General, alleging fraud by Mr Kaiser and Mr Melson on the US Congress.  Mr Fine refuses to this date to investigate such complaints.
Human Rights Alert filed in April 2010 report with the United Nations, [1] where such conduct by the US government senior executive officers was claimed as the core of serious violations of Human Rights and ratified international law.
Response by the US State Department on the reports by various stakeholders is due by August 2010, as part of the first ever review by the United Nations of the Human Rights record of the United States.
Locations of visitors to this page
April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
b) Submission:
c) Appendix:
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
Congressional Testimony
blue space bar

Arthur M. Cummings
Executive Assistant Director, National Security Branch
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Statement Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law
October 6, 2009

Good afternoon, Chairman Durbin, Ranking Member Coburn and Members of the Subcommittee. I am pleased to be here with you today to discuss the FBI's efforts as they relate to human rights enforcement.

Philosopher George Santayana once said, "Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it." While the notion of human rights clearly came into focus in the days after World War II and with the creation of the United Nations, the hope for such policy was alive and well long before the Magna Carta was ever penned. Sadly, though, even today human rights violations are the rule rather than the exception in many countries.

For example, the State Department's 2009 Human Rights Report found that while these rights thrive best in democratic, civil societies and that there is indeed a greater demand for personal and political freedom, there are also significant governmental efforts to deny those freedoms in many countries. According to the State Department, in Africa, several countries have played a stabilizing role on the continent as they embraced the rule of law but in other parts, human rights abuses have continued. Asia also had a mixed record on human rights. In Europe and Eurasia, the influx of immigrants from economically strained areas has contributed to an increase in nationalism and hate crimes.

For its part, the FBI is committed to supplementing the international community's efforts to advance human rights. Our mission is to identify human rights violators in the U.S. and bring them to justice for violations committed within and outside of the United States. We investigate violators for both human rights and traditional criminal violations. For example, together with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), we investigated Roy M. Belfast, aka "Chuckie Taylor," son of the former Liberian dictator Charles Taylor. Chuckie Taylor was found guilty in federal court on multiple counts of torture and violent crime offenses for his role in commanding the paramilitary Anti-Terrorist Unit in Liberia between 1999 and 2003. In addition, together with the U.S. Army Criminal Investigations Division, the FBI investigated Steven D. Green, a Ft. Campbell, Kentucky soldier who was eventually convicted of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and murdering both the girl and her family.

FBI Jurisdiction

Since 1988, Congress has enacted a series of statutes that have expanded the FBI's investigative jurisdiction of human rights issues in the international arena. For example, Chapter 50A of Title 18 was enacted in 1988 and added the offense of genocide to the U.S criminal code. Torture was included in 1994 and war crimes in 1996. Most recently, in October 2008, the Recruitment of Child Soldiers was added in Chapter 118.

Executive Order 13107, which outlined the implementation of human rights treaties, required each executive agency to "designate a single contact officer who will be responsible for overall coordination of the implementation" of the Order. The Order also required agencies to "maintain current awareness of United States international human rights obligations that are relevant to their functions" and to "perform such functions so as to respect and implement those obligations fully." FBI responsibilities in this regard include the investigation of allegations of genocide, torture, war crimes, and the recruitment of child soldiers, and the development of a collaborative working relationship with ICE.

Although our authority in this area has grown with the enactment of the aforementioned laws, our reach remains limited by legal restrictions. For example, for many well-known international human rights atrocities, the statutes of limitations have run or the atrocities took place before the laws were enacted, thereby implicating the ex post facto clause of the Constitution. In addition, it is often difficult to identify cases with the requisite nexus to the United States. Human rights offenses under Title 18 of the U.S. code generally require the human rights violator to be a U.S. national, to have committed the offense against a U.S. national, or to be present in the U.S. The identification of targets that satisfy this nexus is challenging because the majority of these abuses occur in foreign countries where access to witnesses and evidence is often limited. In addition, the violator is often protected by a regime that is sympathetic to the violator or politically embarrassed by the allegations of human rights abuses. Nonetheless, the FBI has had success in bringing human rights violators to justice, and expects to have success in the future as well.

FBI's Human Rights Enforcement Strategy

The FBI supports the overarching U.S. government principle that respect for human rights helps to secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises. With additional funding for human rights enforcement provided by Congress in the FY2009 budget, we are expanding our investigative efforts in this area and establishing a Human Rights Offenses Program. As part of this program, the FBI will utilize four key strategies "joint investigations, training, intelligence collection, and assistance to international investigative bodies" to fulfill our commitment to the enforcement of human rights laws and the promotion of human rights principles.

First, utilizing
 "rule of law" principles, the FBI will, together with our domestic and international law enforcement partners, investigate priority human rights cases using established investigative techniques and protocols. Second, the FBI will train its own personnel and those of our foreign counterparts to ensure that human rights investigations are conducted in a manner consistent with "rule of law" principles. These trainings will strengthen our investigative efforts and promote institutionalized respect for human rights. Third, the FBI will aggressively collect domestic and international intelligence on human rights violators and violations through its 56 field offices, 60 foreign legal attaches, network of sources within and outside of the United States, and relationships with domestic and international law enforcement partners. Fourth, in response to requests from international and foreign investigative bodies, the FBI will provide assistance that advances efforts to enforce human rights laws in foreign and international legal fora.

The FBI plans to dedicate supervisory personnel at FBI Headquarters to manage the Human Rights Offenses Program. A program manager will ensure that the FBI's domestic field offices and foreign legal attaches are fully engaged in advancing our human rights mission. In addition, FBI plans to dedicate a number of additional personnel at Headquarters to support the program. Together, the team managing the Human Rights Offense Program will conduct a domain assessment of human rights violations that will enable the FBI to determine how to focus its investigative and intelligence-gathering efforts in an efficient and informed manner, provide day-to-day support to domestic field agents and overseas legal attaches, coordinate with prosecutors at the Department of Justice, and coordinate with ICE and other agencies on potential joint investigations.

With this dedicated corps of personnel, the FBI intends to issue human rights intelligence requirements to its 56 domestic field offices and its 60 foreign legal attaches. We will develop performance measures and hold periodic reviews to ensure that agents and analysts in the field are actively addressing human rights cases. We plan to identify human rights coordinators in each office, and work with the Department of Justice Criminal Division to conduct trainings that will enable us to develop a body of experts who are dedicated to the investigation and prosecution of human rights abuses.

Eventually, the FBI hopes that based on its domain analysis, it will be in a position to forward deploy dedicated Assistant Legal Attaches (ALATs) in countries with a history of human rights violations that fall within the scope of U.S. human rights laws. These ALATs would be expected to establish contacts with human rights officials in the embassies and local non-government organizations, collect intelligence on human rights, and support human rights investigations.

Through these efforts, the FBI expects to increase its contribution to the international community's ongoing effort to bring human rights violators to justice. With the benefit of lessons learned and the development of best practices, the manager of the Human Rights Offenses Program will adjust the FBI's strategy as necessary to maximize the program's effectiveness.

Chairman Durbin, Ranking Member Coburn and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to come before you today and share the work that the FBI is doing to address human rights violations. I am happy to answer any questions.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -