.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Saturday, June 19, 2010

10-06-20 SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Hallmark of Enforcement in Current Banking Crisis - Alleged as Invalid Litigation // SEC v Bank of America Corporation (01:09-cv-06829) - Destacarde la observancia de la crisis bancaria actual - que se alegue que los litigios no válido // SEC gegen die Bank of America Corporation (01.09-cv-06829) - Kennzeichen der Durchsetzung derzeitige Bankenkrise - Angebliche als ungültige Rechtsstreit

US District Court • Southern District of New York

Chief Judge Loretta Preska




SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) -  Hallmark of Enforcement in Current Banking Crisis - Alleged as Invalid Litigation
New York, June 20 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Dr Joseph Zernik filed repeat requests with Mary L Schapiro - SEC Chair [1], Brian Moynihan - Bank of America Corporation President/CEO [2], and the Honorable Loretta Preska - US District Court, Southern District of New York Chief Judge, [3] to access public records - judicial records in SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829).  Request was for the summons as well as the authentication records (NEFs) of all court minutes, orders, and the judgment in the case.  Specific request was made for the authentication records of the February 2010 court records, which brought the case to its end - Opinion and Order and  Final Consent Judgment.  The authentication records (NEFs) are essential for determining the validity and effect of judicial records, which are today digital records, generated in the US courts' case management system - CM/ECF.  Previous requests, which were filed with Bank of America, with SEC, and with the Court itself were denied with no explanation at all.  The request filed by Human Rights Alert with the US District Court today invoked the First Amendment right to access judicial records - to inspect and to copy.  The requests filed with SEC and Bank of America also invoked the inherent interest of Dr Zernik as a shareholder of Bank of America Corporation.
Human Rights Alert claimed that the ongoing refusal of all three parties to provide access to such public records, and other evidence as well, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829) was likely to have been an invalid litigation and a pretense of enforcement of the law.  The case itself was viewed as the hallmark of enforcement of regulation under the current banking crisis. It was extensively and repeatedly covered by main media outlets, such as the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.  However, it was doubted that any media ever gained access to the authentication records, access to which was repeatedly requested by Dr Zernik for over half a year.
Conditions, prevailing at the US courts, were analyzed in detail in a scholarly paper, titled: Data Mining of the Online Judicial Records in the Networked US Federal Courts, 
[4] soon to be submitted by Human Rights Alert for international peer review.
The paper stated:
 "... records obtained from multiple cases in various US courts across the United States documented the tight relationship between conditions at the US courts, and the current banking crisis.  There simply is no way to institute honest and effective banking regulation absent honest enforcement at the US courts."
The paper concluded:
"The transition to digital administration entailed a sea change in procedures of the US courts. The transition took place over a relatively short time, was independently executed by the US courts through the Administrative Office of the Courts, under insufficient public and legal accountability. The transition resulted in precipitous deterioration in integrity of the courts, in human rights, and in enforcement by regulatory agencies in the United States."
Copies of the requests were filed with John Dugan - Comptroller of the Currency, with Chairs of the US Congress Banking and Judiciary Committees, with the Basel Accords Committee on international banking, and with various national central banks.
###
Contact:
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert
______
LINKS AND ATTACHMENTS:
[1]
Repeat request filed with Mary L Schapiro - SEC Chair:


Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:04:43 +0300
To: "Schapiro, Mary L (SEC)"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829) - repeat request for public records
Cc: , "Enforcement" , Sec Help , "Bezek, Samuel" , Sec , Sec , Secchairmanoffice , , oig@sec.gov, "Silverwood, James R." , US SEC Chairman Office , US SEC Enforcement, US SEC Chair , , "Silverwood, James R." ,
June 20, 2010
Mary L Schapiro, SEC Chair
SchapiroM@sec.gov
RE: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829) - Repeat request to provide access to public records - judicial records, which are the summons and authentication records (NEFs)
Dear Ms Schapiro:
Please accept this repeat request by a Bank of America Corporation shareholder, to provide access to public records - judicial records, which are the summons and authentication records (NEFs) of all court minutes, orders, and the judgment in SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829).
The evidence, including, but not limited to refusal of SEC to provide access to such public records, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that SEC engaged in an invalid litigation and pretense enforcement in this case.
Conduct of Bank of America, combined with the Bank of America Outside Counsel Procedures,
[1]  Certifications, which were signed by Mr Moynihan, President and CEO, pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002) in recent periodic reports, [2][3] and Disclosure pursuant to Basel II Pillar III, [4] are alleged as obstruction and perversion of justice, fraud on individuals, fraud on shareholders at large, fraud on US taxpayers, and fraud on the international banking community.
Therefore, please also accept this notice as a request that you enforce the law on Bank of America Corporation in compliance with the law and your duties and obligations. 
Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
CC:
1) John Dugan, Comptroller of the Currency
2) Basel Accord Committee
3) National Central Banks, Research Departments
4) US Congress - Banking and Judiciary Committee Chairs.
LINKS:
[1]
08-12-11-Bank-of-America-Outside-Counsel-Procedures-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27932516/
[2]
10-05-07-BANK-OF-AMERICA-CORP-DE-Form-10-Q-Received-05-07-2010-07-49-51-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32256751/
[3]
10-02-26-BANK-OF-AMERICA-CORP-DE-Form-10-K-Received-02-26-2010-07-51-53-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32260743/
[4]
09-12-31-Bank-of-America-MBNA-Canada-Bank-II-Basel-Pillar-III-Disclosure-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32219320/
______
[2]
Repeat request filed with Brian Moynihan - Bank of America Corporation President/CEO:

Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 08:46:53 +0300
To: "Moynihan, Brian T (BofA)"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829) - repeat request for public records
Cc: "Amberg, John W." , "Van Cleve, Peter D. - Managing Partner � St. Louis" , "Modisett, Jeffrey A, Managing Partner- LA" , , "Attention: General Counsel Ed O'Keef" , , , , , , "Samuels, Sandor - Legal" , "Shatz, Sanford -Legal" , "Boock, Todd A -Legal" , "General Counsel Ed O'Keefe" , swprice@bryancave.com, litwinovich@bryancave.com, "Attention Brian Moynihan" , , "Samuels, Sandor - Legal" , "Boock, Todd A -Legal" , "Shatz, Sanford -Legal" , "Modisett, Jeffrey A, Managing Partner- LA" < jamodisett@bryancave.com >,

June 20, 2010
Brian T Moynihan, President/CEO (BofA)
brian.t.moynihan@bankofamerica.com
RE: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829) - Repeat request to provide access to public records - judicial records, which are the summons and authentication records (NEFs)
Dear Mr Moynihan:
Please accept this repeat request by a shareholder, to provide access to public records - judicial records, which are the summons and authentication records (NEFs) of all court minutes, orders, and the judgment in SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829).
The evidence, including, but not limited to refusal of Bank of America Corporation to provide access to such public records, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that Bank of America Corporation engaged in an invalid litigation and pretense justice in this case.
Please also accept this notice as a request that you comply with reporting duties pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002). 
Conduct of Bank of America, under your leadership, combined with the Bank of America Outside Counsel Procedures,
[1]  Certifications, which you signed pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002) in recent periodic reports, [2][3] and Disclosure pursuant to Basel II Pillar III, [4] are alleged as obstruction and perversion of justice, fraud on individuals, fraud on shareholders at large, fraud on US taxpayers, and fraud on the international banking community.
Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
CC:
1) John Dugan, Comptroller of the Currency
2) Mary L Schapiro, Chair, SEC
3) Basel Accord Committee
4) National Central Banks, Research Departments
5) US Congress - Banking and Judiciary Committee Chairs.
LINKS:
[1]
08-12-11-Bank-of-America-Outside-Counsel-Procedures-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27932516/
[2]
10-05-07-BANK-OF-AMERICA-CORP-DE-Form-10-Q-Received-05-07-2010-07-49-51-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32256751/
[3]
10-02-26-BANK-OF-AMERICA-CORP-DE-Form-10-K-Received-02-26-2010-07-51-53-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32260743/
[4]
09-12-31-Bank-of-America-MBNA-Canada-Bank-II-Basel-Pillar-III-Disclosure-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32219320/
______
[3]
Repeat request filed with Honorable Loretta Preska - US District Court, Southern District of New York, Chief Judge:

Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:05:12 +0300
To: "Deputy Clerk Cliffor Kirsch","Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829) - repeat request for public records
Cc: "Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)" , "Shell, Thomas\(USMS\)"

June 20, 2010
The Honorable Loretta A Preska
Chief Judge
US District Court, Southern District of New York
C/O:
Ruby Krajick,
Clerk of the Court
Clifford Kirsch,
Deputy Clerk
RE: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829) - Repeat request to provide access to public records - judicial records, which are the summons and authentication records (NEFs)
Dear Judge Preska:
Please accept instant notice as a repeat request to provide access to public records - judicial records, which are the summons and the authentication records (NEFs) of all court minutes, orders, and the judgment in SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829), including, but not limited to: (a) Dkt #96 OPINION AND ORDER and (b) Dkt #97 FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION. 
Like previous requests, instant request is made pursuant to First Amendment rights and Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978).  Previous requests were denied with no reason at all. 
Instant request is also made by a shareholder in Bank of America Corporation, pursuant to the right for Fair Hearings in ratified international law - the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and common law right to access judicial records - to inspect and to copy.
Your expedient attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

CC:
1) John Dugan - Comptroller of the Currency
2) Mary L Schapiro - SEC Chair
3) Basel Accord Committee
4) National Central Banks, Research Departments
5) US Congress - Banking and Judiciary Committee Chairs.
______

[4] Data Mining of the Online Judicial Records in the Networked US Federal Courts
http://inproperinla.com/10-06-18-paper-2-courts-s.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine