.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Monday, May 17, 2010

10-05-16 Notice forwarded to the US State Department // Beachten Sie übermittelte dem US State Department // Comunicación enviada al Departamento de Estado de EE.UU.

Outline of the first ever Universal Periodic Review (UPR) by the United Nations of Human Rights in the United States:
  • April 2010 -    Reports by stakeholders due with the UN.
  • August 2010 -   Response on the reports by the US State Department due with the United Nations
  • November 2010 -  Review session and report issued by the United Nations
  • Later than November 2010 - US State Department and the UN discussion on future goals.
  • 2014 -          Next UPR by the UN of Human Rights in the US.


Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:53:16 +0300
To: upr_info@state.gov
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Marina v LA County (BS108420) and Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286) - US Supreme Court and Cal Court of Appeals to review non-cases of the Los Angeles Superior Court


To: US State Department, UPR Office
From: Human Rights Alert, NGO
RE: Marina v LA County (BS108420) and Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286) - US Supreme Court and Cal Court of Appeals to review non-cases of the Los Angeles Superior Court

Please accept the message below, forwarded to US Congress Judiciary Committees, as additional evidence of serious, widespread violations of Human Rights by the US Justice System in Los Angeles County, California, which the US government is refusing to address, and which were the core of April 2010 Human Rights Alert submission  (linked below) to the  the United Nations and to the US State Department UPR Office.

This message is forwarded to the UPR Office of the US State Department, following the outline of the UPR process in UN publications and in the "UPR Tool Kit," (linked below), and as part of further effort to enter discussion of the alleged violations of Human Rights in the United States, in hope that the US State Department will respond on the allegations in its submission to the United Nations as part of the UPR, due August 2010.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

CC:
1) Urban Justice Center, New York
2) UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
_______________
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:44:10 +0300
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Marina v LA County (BS108420) and Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286) - US Supreme Court and Cal Court of Appeals to review non-cases of the Los Angeles Superior Court
Cc: "Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)" , "Senator Feinstein- DC"<1-202-228-3954@metrofax.com>, "Senator Feinstein- SF" <1-415-393-0710@metrofax.com>, "Rep Barney Frank - Chair, House Financial Services Committee"<1-202-225-6952@metrofax.com>, "Attention Rep Barney Frank" <1-202-225-0182@metrofax.com>, "Attention Senator Christopher Dodd - Chair, Senate Banking Committee" < 1-202-224-1083@metrofax.com>, "Attention Senator Leahy-Judiciary Committee"  <1-202-224-3479@metrofax.com>, "Representative Conyers - House Judiciary Committee" <1-202-225-0072@metrofax.com>, "Senator Carl Levine" <1-202-224-1388@metrofax.com>

 -
Marina v LA County (BS108420) and Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286) US Supreme Court and California Court of Appeals to review non-cases of the Los Angeles Superior Court

What media reports, such as AHRC - below, and most observers failed to realize is that the legal battles on both cases that are subject of the news report at hand represent the deep seated alleged corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - based on conduct of litigations that the court itself never deemed valid court cases of the Superior Court of California in the first place.

To wit - in both Marina v LA County - the case in which Richard Fine was purported to be arrested, and in Sturgeon v LA County - the case that purported to review the "not permitted" payments to Los Angeles County judges, judges and referees presided with no Assignment and no Appointment Orders.

To wit - in both cases the purported judgments were never authenticated and never entered by the Court as required by California Code in order to make such judgments "effectual for any purpose."[1]

To wit - in both cases the Los Angeles Superior Court refuses to allow access to the Registers of Actions (California civil dockets) - the definitive court records of the cases.

Therefore, in previous rounds of the same charade, purported habeas corpus on the arrest and false imprisonment of Richard Fine - at the US District Court in Los Angeles, at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, and at the US Supreme Court, as well as purported appeal at the California Court of Appeal, 4th District were conducted out of compliance with fundamental rules and laws - with no dockets for the cases that the respective courts purported to review.  And in the upcoming review round, would again be presumably conducted by the US Supreme Court and the California Court of Appeals, 4th District with no dockets of the cases from the Los Angeles Superior Court.

The ongoing denial of access to court records in Los Angeles County courts, in disregard of First Amendment rights was alleged as fundamental violation of Human Rights in ratified International Law in report filed with the UN in April 2010, scheduled for review as part of Universal Periodic Review (first time ever) of Human Rights in the US in November 2010. [2]

The jurisdiction of review courts pertaining to judgments that were never entered is of course dubious at best.  Such fact is likely to be the explanation for the conduct of the Sheriff and the Los Angeles Superior Court in refusing to respond to the review courts at all. In turn, the review courts - the California Court of Appeals, 4th District, and the US Supreme Court - have developed their own avenue to review non-cases of the lower courts - by responding in kind unsigned, unauthenticated decisions

Its a full blown  display of the  United States "alternative justice system" in action!

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

LINKS:
[1] Search for entered judgments in Marina v LA County and in Sturgeon v LA County in the judgment archives of Los Angeles Superior Court:
[2]  April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Filed-UPR-Report-with-the-United-Nations
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Appendix-for-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-UPR-of-the-United-States-s
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/10-04-13-UPR-Tool-Kit-Urban-Justice-Center-USA-provided-by-UN-office-of-High-Commissioner-for-Human-Rights






An Article
California Judges Losing Ground In Fight To Save Their Illegal Payments:

May 16, 2010

By Full Disclosure Watch (View author info)

Los Angeles, California -Full Disclosure Network presents a nine minute video news update on the long protracted legal battle involving a David and Goliath fight to stop judicial, bias, bribery, conflict of interest and corruption in the California Courts.

FEATURING TWO DAVIDS WHO TOOK ON JUDICIAL GOLIATH

Richard I. Fine
, jailed taxpayer advocate Attorney
Sterling Norris, Judicial Watch public interest attorney
and activist Fred Sottile who describes the circumstances of the two cases both involving Los Angeles County
.
Richard I. Fine vs Sheriff Leroy Baca, L A County and Sturgeon vs County of Los Angeles that have now reached the highest courts and are expected to be resolved within the next few days after an extraordinary legal battle against all odds. Here are some of the particulars:

THURSDAY, MAY 20, 2010

U S SUPREME COURT CONFERENCE HEARING
Richard I. Fine vs Sheriff Leroy Baca, L A County
Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Re: Appeal on Writ of Habeas Corpus)
SHERIFF BACA THROWS IN THE TOWEL AT U S SUPREME COURT

Both Richard Fine and Sterling Norris are very positive regarding the new developments that hold promise they will win in both their cases based on the following two documents:

Sheriff Baca declined to respond (see waiver here) in the U S Supreme Court on Richard I. Fine'sPetition for Writ of Certiorari that could free him from solitary "Coercive Confinement" in the L A County Men's Central Jail. He has been held there for fourteen months even though he has never been charged or convicted of a crime.

L A County and Superior Court Judges Association failed to respond in the Judicial Watch Sturgeon vs County of L. A. case causing the California 4th District Court of Appeals send this notice to respond that the case will be decided on the opening brief and oral argments presented by Judicial Watch if they do not respond by Friday May 21, 2010.

View Comments (0) | Post a comment

For more information, please check out the articles listed below:

  Theodore Boutrous - Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
   Sterling E. Norris
   Richard I. Fine
   Free Richard Fine Website
   Judicial Watch - Tom Fenton - President
   Please join this emergency show tonight, as Judge Yaffe throws homeowners attorney Richard Fine in jail today without cause - Justice4Us - Dr. Shirley Moore
   Atty Richard Fine, Imprisoned for Freedom Fighting - Brooke Kelley
   The Fine Pursuit of Exposing Corruption - Janet Levy
  Richard Fine Files Federal Suit Against California State Bar and the State Bar Court - AHRC News Services
  Attorney Richard Fine resume and some of his unique cases with societal impact - AHRC News Services
  CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS SHOWN BY COURT RECORDS DEMONSTRATES LA JUDGES TARGETED RICHARD I. FINE FOR UPHOLDING CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND SEEKING TO ENFORCE U.S. CONSTITUTION - AHRC News Services
  Attorney Richard Fine Challenges State Bar Action as a Gross Violation of First Amendment Rights of Freedom of Speech and to Petition the Government to Redress Grievances - Richard I. Fine
  RICHARD I. FINE FILES COMPLAINT WITH FBI TO INVESTIGATE RETALIATION AGAINST HIM FOR EXPOSING AND PROSECUTING UNCONSTITUTIONAL PAYMENTS BY LA COUNTY TO LA COUNTY JUDGES - Richard I. Fine
  Former U. S Prosecutor, While Battling Illegal County Payments to Los Angeles County Judges, Falls Victim To Identity Theft and Mail Fraud - AHRC News Services
  RICHARD FINE'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS ANTI SLAPP MOTION AGAINST THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION - Richard I. Fine
  Attorney Richard Fine files suit against judges - Gary Walker
  CALIFORNIA JUDGES ON THE TAKE ..SAYS RICHARD FINE ON YOU TUBE VIDEO - Disclosure Watch - Dr. Shirley Moore
  False Imprisonment of Richard Fine in California -Appeal for Protection under International Law - Joseph Zernik
  APPEAL FOR DONATIONS FOR APPEAL TO UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT - Mardi L. Mason
  Lawyer takes a stand from his cell - Victoria Kim
  The Best Courts Money Could Buy - Free Richard Fine
  Commissioner Shaw of the 9th. Circuit Court of Appeals Issues A Stay On Disbarment of Richard Fine - Tom Shapinsky
  Letter to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices regarding California Court Corruption and the Financial Crisis - American Homeowners Resource Center
  U. S . HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY A JOKE? - Full Disclosure Watch
  Elwood Lui - Jones Day

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine