page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):


Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Friday, April 9, 2010

10-04-09 Dialog with Attorney Zena Crenshaw-Logal in Re: OAK Submission to the United Nations Review of the United States (Part I) // Diálogo con el Procurador Zena Crenshaw-Logal en Re: OAK La sumisión a la revisión de las Naciones Unidas de los Estados Unidos (I)

Draft of OAK NFORJA submission to the United Nations for the Universal Periodic Review of the United States can be viewed at:  


Replies to This Discussion

Hi Zena: Between your recorded talk and the proposed submission, the talk was more coherent, and it served to remind me of the common purpose that we share. The writing I find in need of major work prior to submission. General comments: a) The focus on Respect, or lack thereof, of the Human Rights Obligations of the member nation, was a good opening. There is compelling evidence for disrespect by the highest US officers. It should be expanded. b) The focus on muzzling of attorneys is appropriate and important, but it needs to be focused, and more concise. It appears too timidly written, and too lengthy in proportion. c) Refusal of the US Department of Justice to enforce the law on white collar crime - including judges, prosecutors, and financial institutions, is a crucial component, and should be expanded. You seem to miss the historic process underway, which was recorded in social science studies, books (Harvard law prof, and Chair of TARP - Elizabeth Warren, for one), of decimating the American home-owning middle class, and the role of the courts in collusion with proven criminality by financial institutions in it. Congress itself recognized the nature of the matter - in Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002) and in the Fraud Enforcement Enhancement Act (2009), but US Dept of Justice and the courts are refusing to enforce the law. d) Your conclusion of the need for international monitoring of the conduct of the US justice system, is a major conclusion, which demonstrated to me that you are in touch with reality. It should be expanded and focused. e) Reference to this administration or that administration is irrelevant. Mention of the recent initiative of this officer of that officer, is where you completely lose it, and start sounding like an insider of the DC beltway. The US under the US Constitution is one member nation of the United Nations. Membership in the UN was never offered to any individual president, Senator, member of Congress, or officer of the US Department of Justice. Stating the problems is not blaming or praising Obama, or Bush, or Reagan or Eisenhower, or Roosevelt... Under the UPR, the United Nations, and the international community examine the Human Right record, not recent initiative that may or may not be effectual. The record is examined of one nation, which is the United States of America. f) Effectively communicating with the UPR must never be deemed as disloyalty to the US Constitution. On the contrary, it should be deemed exercise of First Amendment rights, a key provision of the US Constitution. On form: 1) The format in general is unclear. 2) I find any URL links in the body of a paper unpleasant, footnotes or endnotes are much better. Joseph Zernik

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -