.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

10-04-07 Large-Scale Shell Game Fraud Alleged in Computers of the US Courts – AOC Comments Requested // Fraude Shell juego a gran escala alegados en Informática de los Tribunales de EE.UU. - Comentarios AOC requerido

Los Angeles, April 7 – in letter to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOC) Human Rights Alert – a Los Angeles-based NGO and Dr Joseph Zernik requested the AOC’s comments/responses on allegations of large-scale shell game fraud in design and operations of the United States courts computer systems. The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems were implemented at the courts in a massive project, overseen by the AOC, which lasted over a decade, at estimated cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.  Response of the AOC was requested for inclusion in a report scheduled for submission by Human Rights Alert to the United Nations, as part of the first ever Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights record of the United States.  The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the US courts are alleged by Human Rights Alert as key to the precipitous deterioration of court integrity in the US in recent decades, and as the largest Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind.

The April 7 letter to AOC, copied below, made the following four specific claims:
1) Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF amounted to a sea change in court procedures.  However, in no case that was examined, did the court comply with Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC §2071-7.  In all cases that were examined the courts failed to establish their new practices and procedure in Local Rules of Courts, as required by law.
2) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by concerted efforts to deny the public the Right to Access Court Records - to inspect and to copy.  Such denial of access was most clearly seen in relationship to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) at the US district courts, and the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) at the US courts of appeals.  The denial of the Right to Access Court Records was most blatant when applied to parties in litigations, who were pro se filers.
3) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by denial of the Right to Service and Notice - a cornerstone of Due Process Rights.  Such denial of Service and Notice was directed in a discriminatory fashion against pro se filers.
4) In all cases that were examined, features were found in PACER and CM/ECF, which upon review by competent panels of jurisdiction, must be deemed as fraud both by design of the systems and in their current mode of operations. Such alleged fraud on the people was perpetrated in a concerted fashion by the United States judiciary as a class, enabling perversion of justice and denial of access to national tribunals for protection of rights.

Review of the Human Rights record of the United States by the United Nations is due November 2010.  Human Rights Alert claims in its report that the states and US courts are central to abuse of the Human Rights of the people in the United States.


 Attached:
April 7, 2010 letter by Human Rights Alert to AOC

April 7, 2010

Public Affairs Office
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
One Columbus Circle NE
Washington, D.C. 20544

The favor of response within 10 days is requested. Time is of the essence!

RE: PACER and CM/ECF

Dear Sir/Madam:

Human Rights Alert, a Los Angeles-based NGO, is in final stages of preparing a report for submission to the United Nations as part of the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights record of the United States.

Your comments and responses are requested regarding a series of papers,[1]-[19] where the nature of the case management/electronic case filing (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the United States courts were explored. The papers were mostly based on the systems as implemented at the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.  However, additional district courts and one additional court of appeal were examined as well.

The outcome of such examination can be summed as follows:

1) Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF amounted to a sea change in court procedures.  However, in no case that was examined, did the court comply with Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC §2071-7.  In all cases that were examined the courts failed to establish their new practices and procedure in Local Rules of Courts, as required by law.

2) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by concerted efforts to deny the public the Right to Access Court Records - to inspect and to copy.  Such denial of access was most clearly seen in relationship to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) at the US district courts, and the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) at the US courts of appeals.  The denial of the Right to Access Court Records was most blatant when applied to parties in litigations, who were pro se filers.

3) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by denial of the Right to Service and Notice - a cornerstone of Due Process Rights.  Such denial of Service and Notice was directed in a discriminatory fashion against pro se filers.

4) In all cases that were examined, features were found in PACER and CM/ECF, which upon review by competent panels of jurisdiction, must be deemed as fraud both by design of the systems and in their current mode of operations. Such alleged fraud on the people was perpetrated in a concerted fashion by the United States judiciary as a class, enabling perversion of justice and denial of access to national tribunals for protection of rights.

IN SHORT:
The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the US courts are alleged key to the precipitous deterioration of court integrity in the US in recent decades, and as the largest Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

LINKS:






















Los Angeles, 7 de abril - en la carta a la Oficina Administrativa de los Tribunales de los Estados Unidos (AOC) de Derechos Humanos de alerta - una en Los Angeles, ONG y el Dr. José Zernik solicitó los comentarios de la AOC / respuestas sobre las denuncias de fraude shell juego a gran escala en diseño y las operaciones de los sistemas informáticos de los Estados Unidos los tribunales. La gestión de casos (CM / ECF) y de acceso público (PACER) sistemas se implantaron en los tribunales en un gran proyecto, supervisado por el certificado de operador aéreo, que duró más de una década, el costo estimado de en cientos de millones de dólares.Respuesta de la AOC se solicitó para su inclusión en un informe previsto para la presentación por los Derechos Humanos de alerta ante las Naciones Unidas, como parte del primer Examen Periódico Universal del registro de Derechos Humanos de los Estados Unidos. La gestión de casos (CM / ECF) y de acceso público (PACER) sistemas de los tribunales de EE.UU. son alegados por los Derechos Humanos de alerta como clave para el deterioro de la integridad judicial precipitada en los EE.UU. en las últimas décadas, y es el mayor fraude de juego en el Shell historia de la humanidad.
El 7 de abril carta a AOC, copiado a continuación, hizo las siguientes cuatro alegaciones específicas:1) La aplicación de PACER y CM / ECF ascendieron a un cambio radical en los procedimientos judiciales. Sin embargo, en ningún caso que se examina, el tribunal hizo cumplir la Ley de Autorización de elaboración de normas 28 USC § 2071-7. En todos los casos que se analizaron los tribunales no para establecer sus nuevas prácticas y procedimientos en las Reglas Locales de Tribunales, según lo dispuesto por la ley.2) En todos los casos que se analizaron, sin excepción, la instalación de CM / ECF y PACER también estuvo acompañada de esfuerzos concertados para negar al público el derecho de acceso a Expedientes de la Corte - para inspeccionar y copiar. Esa negación de acceso se ve más claramente en relación con el FNMA (Informaciones de Electronic Presentados) en las cortes de distrito de EE.UU., y los acuerdos de confidencialidad (Las notificaciones de Rol de la actividad) en las cortes de Apelaciones de EE.UU.. La negación del derecho de acceso a los registros Tribunal fue más patente cuando se aplica a las partes en litigios, que eran pro contribuyentes se.3) En todos los casos que se analizaron, sin excepción, la instalación de CM / ECF y PACER también estuvo acompañada por la negación del derecho de Notificación y aviso - la piedra angular de los Derechos Debido Proceso. Esa negación del servicio y la Comunicación se dirigía de forma discriminatoria contra los contribuyentes pro se.4) En todos los casos examinados, las características se encontraron en PACER y CM / ECF, que, previo examen por grupos de expertos competentes de la jurisdicción, debe considerarse como fraude, tanto por el diseño de los sistemas y en su modo actual de las operaciones.Tales supuestos fraudes en las personas fue perpetrado de forma concertada por el poder judicial de los Estados Unidos como una clase, permitiendo la perversión de la justicia y la denegación de acceso a los tribunales nacionales para la protección de los derechos.
Revisión de la historia de Derechos Humanos de los Estados Unidos por las Naciones Unidas se debe noviembre de 2010. Alerta de Derechos Humanos afirma en su informe que los estados y tribunales de los EE.UU. son fundamentales para el abuso de los derechos humanos de las personas en los Estados Unidos.

Adjunto: 7 de abril 2010 escrito por Human Rights Alert para AOC
7 de abril 2010
Oficina de Relaciones PúblicasOficina Administrativa de los Tribunales de Estados UnidosUna NE Columbus CircleWashington, D. C. 20544Por correo electrónico a http://www.uscourts.gov/comment.htmlPor fax: 202.502.2633 @ metrofax.com
El favor de la respuesta dentro de 10 días se solicita. El tiempo es esencial!
RE: PACER y CM / ECF
Estimado señor / señora:
Human Rights Alert, una sede en Los Angeles ONG, se encuentra en etapas finales de preparación de un informe para presentarlo ante las Naciones Unidas como parte del Examen Periódico Universal del registro de Derechos Humanos de los Estados Unidos.
Sus comentarios y las respuestas se solicitan en relación con una serie de documentos, [1] - [19], cuando la naturaleza de la gestión de casos y de archivo de casos electrónicos (CM / ECF) y de acceso público (PACER) sistemas de los tribunales de los Estados Unidos fueron exploradas. Los trabajos se basaron principalmente en los sistemas tal como se aplica en el Tribunal de Distrito de EE.UU., Distrito Central de California, y el Tribunal de Apelaciones de EE.UU., del 9 º Circuito. Sin embargo, los tribunales de distrito y un adicional de corte adicional de impugnación fueron examinadas también.
El resultado de ese examen se puede resumir de la siguiente manera:
1) La aplicación de PACER y CM / ECF ascendieron a un cambio radical en los procedimientos judiciales. Sin embargo, en ningún caso que se examina, el tribunal hizo cumplir la Ley de Autorización de elaboración de normas 28 USC § 2071-7. En todos los casos que se analizaron los tribunales no para establecer sus nuevas prácticas y procedimientos en las Reglas Locales de Tribunales, según lo dispuesto por la ley.
2) En todos los casos que se analizaron, sin excepción, la instalación de CM / ECF y PACER también estuvo acompañada de esfuerzos concertados para negar al público el derecho de acceso a Expedientes de la Corte - para inspeccionar y copiar. Esa negación de acceso se ve más claramente en relación con el FNMA (Informaciones de Electronic Presentados) en las cortes de distrito de EE.UU., y los acuerdos de confidencialidad (Las notificaciones de Rol de la actividad) en las cortes de Apelaciones de EE.UU.. La negación del derecho de acceso a los registros Tribunal fue más patente cuando se aplica a las partes en litigios, que eran pro contribuyentes se.
3) En todos los casos que se analizaron, sin excepción, la instalación de CM / ECF y PACER también estuvo acompañada por la negación del derecho de Notificación y aviso - la piedra angular de los Derechos Debido Proceso. Esa negación del servicio y la Comunicación se dirigía de forma discriminatoria contra los contribuyentes pro se.
4) En todos los casos examinados, las características se encontraron en PACER y CM / ECF, que, previo examen por grupos de expertos competentes de la jurisdicción, debe considerarse como fraude, tanto por el diseño de los sistemas y en su modo actual de las operaciones.Tales supuestos fraudes en las personas fue perpetrado de forma concertada por el poder judicial de los Estados Unidos como una clase, permitiendo la perversión de la justicia y la denegación de acceso a los tribunales nacionales para la protección de los derechos.
En pocas palabras:La gestión de casos (CM / ECF) y de acceso público (PACER) los sistemas de los tribunales de EE.UU. se alega clave para el deterioro de la integridad judicial precipitada en los EE.UU. en las últimas décadas, y es el mayor fraude Shell juego en la historia de la humanidad.
En verdad,

 
José Zernik, PhDAlerta de los Derechos Humanos (HRA), ONGhttp://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
ENLACES:



Los Angeles, April 7 – in letter to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOC) Human Rights Alert – a Los Angeles-based NGO and Dr Joseph Zernik requested the AOC’s comments/responses on allegations of large-scale shell game fraud in design and operations of the United States courts computer systems. The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems were implemented at the courts in a massive project, overseen by the AOC, which lasted over a decade, at estimated cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.  Response of the AOC was requested for inclusion in a report scheduled for submission by Human Rights Alert to the United Nations, as part of the first ever Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights record of the United States.  The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the US courts are alleged by Human Rights Alert as key to the precipitous deterioration of court integrity in the US in recent decades, and as the largest Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind.

The April 7 letter to AOC, copied below, made the following four specific claims:
1) Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF amounted to a sea change in court procedures.  However, in no case that was examined, did the court comply with Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC §2071-7.  In all cases that were examined the courts failed to establish their new practices and procedure in Local Rules of Courts, as required by law.
2) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by concerted efforts to deny the public the Right to Access Court Records - to inspect and to copy.  Such denial of access was most clearly seen in relationship to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) at the US district courts, and the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) at the US courts of appeals.  The denial of the Right to Access Court Records was most blatant when applied to parties in litigations, who were pro se filers.
3) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by denial of the Right to Service and Notice - a cornerstone of Due Process Rights.  Such denial of Service and Notice was directed in a discriminatory fashion against pro se filers.
4) In all cases that were examined, features were found in PACER and CM/ECF, which upon review by competent panels of jurisdiction, must be deemed as fraud both by design of the systems and in their current mode of operations. Such alleged fraud on the people was perpetrated in a concerted fashion by the United States judiciary as a class, enabling perversion of justice and denial of access to national tribunals for protection of rights.

Review of the Human Rights record of the United States by the United Nations is due November 2010.  Human Rights Alert claims in its report that the states and US courts are central to abuse of the Human Rights of the people in the United States.


 Attached:
April 7, 2010 letter by Human Rights Alert to AOC

April 7, 2010

Public Affairs Office
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
One Columbus Circle NE
Washington, D.C. 20544

The favor of response within 10 days is requested. Time is of the essence!

RE: PACER and CM/ECF

Dear Sir/Madam:

Human Rights Alert, a Los Angeles-based NGO, is in final stages of preparing a report for submission to the United Nations as part of the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights record of the United States.

Your comments and responses are requested regarding a series of papers,[1]-[19] where the nature of the case management/electronic case filing (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the United States courts were explored. The papers were mostly based on the systems as implemented at the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.  However, additional district courts and one additional court of appeal were examined as well.

The outcome of such examination can be summed as follows:

1) Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF amounted to a sea change in court procedures.  However, in no case that was examined, did the court comply with Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC §2071-7.  In all cases that were examined the courts failed to establish their new practices and procedure in Local Rules of Courts, as required by law.

2) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by concerted efforts to deny the public the Right to Access Court Records - to inspect and to copy.  Such denial of access was most clearly seen in relationship to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) at the US district courts, and the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) at the US courts of appeals.  The denial of the Right to Access Court Records was most blatant when applied to parties in litigations, who were pro se filers.

3) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by denial of the Right to Service and Notice - a cornerstone of Due Process Rights.  Such denial of Service and Notice was directed in a discriminatory fashion against pro se filers.

4) In all cases that were examined, features were found in PACER and CM/ECF, which upon review by competent panels of jurisdiction, must be deemed as fraud both by design of the systems and in their current mode of operations. Such alleged fraud on the people was perpetrated in a concerted fashion by the United States judiciary as a class, enabling perversion of justice and denial of access to national tribunals for protection of rights.

IN SHORT:
The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the US courts are alleged key to the precipitous deterioration of court integrity in the US in recent decades, and as the largest Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

LINKS:



















No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine