.

page counter []
"...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004) * “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000) * "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

Thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) remain locked up more than a decade after official, expert, and media report documented that they were falsely prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in the largest court corruption sandal in the history of the United States...

Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

Nuestro derecho a acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

10-10-01 Corruption of the California courts noticed by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

10-04-07 Case Management System of US Supreme Court // Sistema de Gestión de Casos de Corte Suprema de EE.UU.

Compromised Integrity Alleged of US Supreme Court Computer Systems


Los Angeles, April 7  - in letter [1] to law school faculty and US agencies, Human Rights Alert, a Los Angeles- based NGO, and Dr Joseph Zernik sought help from those more familiar with the business of the United States Supreme Court, in evaluating the integrity of the computer system of the highest court of the land.  Human Rights Alert and Dr Joseph Zernik, engaged in preparation of a report for the United Nations, regarding Human Rights conditions in the US, have previously provided evidence to support the allegation that the computer systems of the US district court and US courts of appeals were a large-scale shell game fraud. However, the computer systems of the US Supreme Court is entirely different platform, which needed to be separately evaluated.  As test case, Dr Zernik raise the question of appearance, or lack thereof, of an application, seeking release from false imprisonment, by the falsely hospitalized Attorney Richard Fine, and a purported March 12, 2010 order denying the application.  The purported order was communicated through an unsigned March 12, 2010 letter by the clerk of the US Supreme Court. However, search for the appearance of the respective order in the online listing of orders of the US Supreme Court, revealed no such order.

Review of the Human Rights record of the United States by the United Nations is due November 2010. Human Rights Alert claims in its report that the states and US courts are central to abuse of the Human Rights of the people in the United States.

ATTACHED:

[1] April 7, 2010 Letter by Human Rights Alert and Dr Joseph Zernik requesting help in evaluation of integrity, or lack thereof, of the computer system of the United States Supreme Court.
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:21:05 -0700
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Richard Fine: Request for help in re: Case management system of SCOTUS: Index of Cases, Index of Orders
Dear All:

RE: Richard Fine: Request for help in re: Case management system of SCOTUS: Index of Cases, Index of Orders

I am seeking help from those more experienced with SCOTUS business.  I have mostly examined computers of the US district courts and US courts of appeals, but not SCOTUS.

The question is regarding appearance, or lack thereof, in any type of Index of Cases, of a case (Application 09-A827) filed by Richard Fine as Richard I Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County, and captioned by clerk of the court as Richard I Fine v Lee D Baca.

Alternatively, the question is regarding appearance, or lack thereof, in any type of Index of Orders/Decisions of a purported March 12, 2010 Order by Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, denying the above named application.

I am running against time, and would like to include this issue in my report to the UN, but am not familiar enough with the case management system of SCOTUS.

Any comments would be greatly appreciated.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

LINKS:
1) List of lists of orders of SCOTUS in the relevant period:
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-04-07-lists-of-orders-of-us-supreme-court.pdf
2) March 8, 2010 Order List
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-08%20order%20list.pdf
3) March 15, 2010 Order List
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-15-order%20list.pdf
4) March 19, 2010 Order List
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-19%20order%20list.pdf

5) March 12, 2010 letter by clerk purporting that the application was denied March 12, 2010
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-12-letter-by%20clerk%20denying%20fine%20application.pdf

                                                                   
El compromiso de la integridad de los EE.UU. Presunta Suprema Corte Informática de Sistemas Los Angeles, 7 de abril - en la carta [1] a los profesores del colegio de abogados y agencias de EE.UU., Human Rights Alert, una ONG basada en Los Angeles, y el Dr. José Zernik buscó la ayuda de los más familiarizados con el negocio de la Suprema Corte, en la evaluación de la integridad del sistema informático del más alto tribunal de la tierra. Alerta de Derechos Humanos y el Dr. Joseph Zernik, dedicados a la preparación de un informe para las Naciones Unidas, en relación con los Derechos Humanos las condiciones en los EE.UU., tienen ya ha proporcionado evidencia para apoyar la alegación de que los sistemas informáticos de la corte de distrito de EE.UU. y los tribunales de Apelaciones de EE.UU. se un depósito a gran escala contra el fraude juego. Sin embargo, los sistemas informáticos de la Corte Suprema de los EE.UU. es totalmente diferente plataforma, que debían ser evaluados separadamente. Como caso de prueba, el Dr. Zernik plantear la cuestión de la apariencia, o falta de ella, de una solicitud, en busca de la liberación de detención ilegal, por la falsa hospitalizados abogado Richard Fine, y un supuesto 12 de marzo 2010 para negar la solicitud. La orden fue comunicada a través de supuestos sin firmar un 12 de marzo 2010 escrito por el secretario de la Corte Suprema de los EE.UU.. Sin embargo, la búsqueda de la aparición de la orden respectiva en la lista en línea de las órdenes de la Corte Suprema de los EE.UU., no reveló tal orden.
  
Revisión de la historia de Derechos Humanos de los Estados Unidos por las Naciones Unidas se debe noviembre de 2010. Alerta de Derechos Humanos afirma en su informe que los estados y tribunales de los EE.UU. son fundamentales para el abuso de los derechos humanos de las personas en los Estados Unidos.
  
ADJUNTO:

Fecha: Wed, 07 de abril 2010 13:21:05 -0700 Para: lawsters@googlegroups.com De: José zernik Asunto: Richard Fine: Petición de ayuda en Re: sistema de manejo de casos de Escoto: Índice de casos, el índice de las órdenes
Queridos todos:
RE: Richard Fine: Petición de ayuda en Re: sistema de manejo de casos de Escoto: Índice de casos, el índice de las órdenes
Estoy buscando la ayuda de los más experimentados con las empresas Escoto. He examinado las computadoras en su mayoría de los tribunales de distrito de EE.UU. y los tribunales de Apelaciones de EE.UU., pero no Escoto.
La pregunta es respecto a la apariencia, o falta de ella, en cualquier tipo de índice de casos, de un caso (Solicitud 09-A827) presentada por Richard Fine como Ricardo I v Bellas Sheriff del Condado de Los Angeles, y subtitulado por el escribano de la corte como Richard Lee I v D Bellas Baca.
Por otra parte, la pregunta es con respecto a la apariencia, o falta de ella, en cualquier tipo de índice de las órdenes / decisiones de un supuesto 12 de marzo 2010 Ordenar por: Asociado juez Anthony Kennedy, negando la solicitud antes mencionada.
Estoy corriendo contra el tiempo, y me gustaría incluir este asunto en mi informe a la ONU, pero no estoy lo suficientemente familiarizado con el sistema de gestión de casos de Escoto.
Todos los comentarios serán bienvenidos.
En verdad,
José Zernik, PhD Alerta de los Derechos Humanos (HRA), ONG http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
ENLACES: 

1) List of lists of orders of SCOTUS in the relevant period:
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-04-07-lists-of-orders-of-us-supreme-court.pdf
2) March 8, 2010 Order List
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-08%20order%20list.pdf
3) March 15, 2010 Order List
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-15-order%20list.pdf
4) March 19, 2010 Order List
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-19%20order%20list.pdf

5) March 12, 2010 letter by clerk purporting that the application was denied March 12, 2010
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-a-supreme-ct-fine-v-baca_10-03-12-letter-by%20clerk%20denying%20fine%20application.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Sign Petition - Free Richard Fine // Por favor, Firme la petición - Liberar a Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Please sign the petition: Free Richard Fine -

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine